Novico Dektri (프로필 보기) 2006년 7월 28일 오전 12:01:23
Por cxiuj kiuj volas legi Hari Poter-n Esperante, cxi tio estas petskribi por traduki gxin. Cxi tio estas la pagxo por subteni gxin:
Novico Dektri (프로필 보기) 2006년 7월 28일 오후 11:32:59
Shawna (프로필 보기) 2006년 7월 30일 오전 9:15:18
Now if I could get my fiance, my godson, and his sister to sign it, hmmm...
I'm actually surprised that it's not already in Esperanto, it's in like 20+ languages already.
kejos144 (프로필 보기) 2006년 7월 30일 오전 10:55:56
Sed Esperanto ne estas realan lingvon/havas malgrandajn sumojn de parolantojn, tia mi dubas ili pagi iu traduki ĝin el la listo de ĉiu lingvo. Tio peticio ne faras probable ni bonon.
(Bonvolu korektu mian gramatikon.)
Shawna (프로필 보기) 2006년 7월 30일 오후 8:33:58
Esperanto has been around for over 100 years, the number of people who speak it has been growing steadily. And two million plus speakers as a low estimate doesn't seem very small to me.
I used to work for WordPath, a Native American language preservation society. Most of the tribal languages we worked with had, max, a couple thousand speakers, and some didn't even have that many. Some didn't have more than a few hundred, if that. I took a year and a half of Cherokee in college, and that has only a few thousand speakers. Yet no one doubted that it was a real language, one in danger of being lost forever, and, thus, deserving of preservation for the next generation.
What is your definition of a "real" language? Does it have to have ethnic or national ties to a particular people or country? By that definition, no, Esperanto is not a "real" language. But that's the whole point of Esperanto, a language that doesn't just "belong" to one people, one tribe, one nation, but to all people.
We have a lot of Spanish-only speakers in my neighborhood, and while I speak some Spanish, I always get the feeling that I'm not on equal ground. They've been speaking Spanish their whole life, they have a whole culture around it, and this gringo here with four years of study can't compete.
The reason I'm learning Esperanto is to get away from all that. Everyone, with the possible exception of children of Esperanto speakers, is a non-native speaker. We come from all over the world. We have a culture that transcends national boundaries. How often do you think people talk to others in other countries? I mean, really talk to? And especially with the global reach of the Internet, the use of a neutral language
And don't feel down about the chances of this happening. The whole point of Esperanto is to bridge cultural and national gaps. Even if this doesn't go through, it lets people know that, yes, a lot of people speak Esperanto, enough that they can realistically ask for their own edition. I'm sure they have Braille editions, so why not an Esperanto edition?
It's probably easier to print an Esperanto edition than some of the others, seeing as we use a Roman-based alphabet. In other languages, Russian for one, the alphabet used can influence how many pages have to be printed. If you keep the type face the same, a Russian translation of an English book might come out a third larger.
Phew, sorry about the rant, but I felt that you touched a nerve. If Esperanto isn't a real language, then there's no point in us being here in this community, and everything we've worked on to help this language and movement grow is literally nothing.
Shawna (프로필 보기) 2006년 8월 1일 오전 1:39:45
That's why I want a copy of the book in Esperanto. I've already got the English.
I just wonder how they would translate the magic words they say. In English, it sounds like mangled Latin.
I'm not sure how you could preserve the strangeness of the word when translating. Of course, they could always leave it as it is. I wouldn't want to be the person who has to figure out how to say "Lumos" in Esperanto!
What if, along with the petition, if some people volunteered to help translate the book into Esperanto? It's possible that they haven't yet because they don't know how to go about finding translators.
Just a thought...