メッセージ: 8
言語: English
Cisksje (プロフィールを表示) 2012年12月15日 14:00:25
tommjames (プロフィールを表示) 2012年12月15日 14:11:22
Some people don't like using "kio" because they feel it invites a response along the line of "it's a word I use to identify myself". There are also those who don't like "kiu" because they feel it suggests a group of names out of which you select your own. But the truth is both ways of asking it are valid and are in use, so it's not worth worrying about.
Chainy (プロフィールを表示) 2012年12月15日 15:28:14
tommjames:Both "Kio estas via nomo?" and "Kiu estas via nomo?" are correct. You might also use "Kiel vi nomiĝas?"+1
Some people don't like using "kio" because they feel it invites a response along the line of "it's a word I use to identify myself". There are also those who don't like "kiu" because they feel it suggests a group of names out of which you select your own. But the truth is both ways of asking it are valid and are in use, so it's not worth worrying about.
Very nice answer, succinct and accurate. This should go in the grammar FAQ here.
Cisksje (プロフィールを表示) 2012年12月15日 18:52:43
tommjames:Both "Kio estas via nomo?" and "Kiu estas via nomo?" are correct. You might also use "Kiel vi nomiĝas?"Thanks for that. I do not remember ever having heard 'kiu' used in this context before.
Some people don't like using "kio" because they feel it invites a response along the line of "it's a word I use to identify myself". There are also those who don't like "kiu" because they feel it suggests a group of names out of which you select your own. But the truth is both ways of asking it are valid and are in use, so it's not worth worrying about.
Roberto12 (プロフィールを表示) 2012年12月15日 19:52:45
erinja (プロフィールを表示) 2012年12月16日 3:06:47
"kio" can't be made plural, and it can be expressed together with plural things.
For example, the following question and answer are considered correct:
Kio estas tio?
Tio estas tri bananoj.
Roberto12 (プロフィールを表示) 2012年12月16日 10:42:42