Kwa maudhui
Kujibu

Too much grammar porrn

ya sudanglo, 16 Februari 2014

Ujumbe: 20

Lugha: English

sudanglo (Wasifu wa mtumiaji) 16 Februari 2014 12:06:41 alasiri

Don't get me wrong. PMEG and especially PAG are works of considerable scholarship.

But if one's knowledge of Esperanto were confined to the 16 rules and study of the Ekzercaro, what essential grammar points would you not have covered?

pS How do I edit the typo in the topic?

lagtendisto (Wasifu wa mtumiaji) 16 Februari 2014 1:52:26 alasiri

sudanglo:But if one's knowledge of Esperanto were confined to the 16 rules and study of the Ekzercaro, what essential grammar points would you not have covered?
PMEG already has minimalistic idea behind. I think Bertilow very well analysed what needs to be in some minimalistic linguistic work which takes linguistic difficulties encounted at Esperanto events and prescribe it later inside PMEG according Zamenhof's Fundamento.

sudanglo (Wasifu wa mtumiaji) 17 Februari 2014 1:36:32 alasiri

I would hardly call PMEG minimalist.

Anyway if you read texts from the early 1900's in Esperanto, it would seem that the pioneers did remarkably well long before the epoch of PAG.

Hundies19 (Wasifu wa mtumiaji) 17 Februari 2014 7:40:28 alasiri

The introduction of PMEG says that many explanations exist in order to address questions which come from speakers of non-indo-european languages. This may be why it is larger than one would expect?

Rejsi (Wasifu wa mtumiaji) 17 Februari 2014 11:18:48 alasiri

sudanglo:Don't get me wrong. PMEG and especially PAG are works of considerable scholarship.

But if one's knowledge of Esperanto were confined to the 16 rules and study of the Ekzercaro, what essential grammar points would you not have covered?

pS How do I edit the typo in the topic?
This is mildly off topic, but what is PAG? I've never heard of it before.

Rikat (Wasifu wa mtumiaji) 18 Februari 2014 12:29:24 asubuhi

PAG is Plena Analiza Gramatiko. Orignally published in 1935, written by two prominent authors in the Esperanto movement.

Read more and find a link to a downloadable version here.

sudanglo (Wasifu wa mtumiaji) 18 Februari 2014 11:02:21 asubuhi

But nobody has answered my question as to what essential points of grammar are not covered by the 16 rules and the Ekzercaro.

How were the early Esperantists able to write so well in Esperanto without these voluminous works of grammar reference?

erinja (Wasifu wa mtumiaji) 18 Februari 2014 2:57:32 alasiri

Esperanto does a lot of grammatical concepts the same as many romance languages. Same form for imperative and a sort of subjunctive etc. Early esperantists who spoke several European languages would have been able to deduce this easily by looking at the ekzercaro and other early sample texts. I suspect that the educated European of that time would have spoken several languages, at least one of which was likely French.

Rugxdoma (Wasifu wa mtumiaji) 18 Februari 2014 8:51:17 alasiri

erinja:Early esperantists who spoke several European languages would have been able to deduce this easily by looking at the ekzercaro and other early sample texts. I suspect that the educated European of that time would have spoken several languages, at least one of which was likely French.
Yes, and even less well educated Europeans, with no knowledge of romance languages, could often deduce this. One reason is that they often had studied some grammar at school, grammar of their own language, which could help them to structure information present in the Ekzercaro. And also, more or less the same basic assumptions about how to form prases, sentences etc are presupposed by all Europeans. That is true both for speakers of a Germanic language like Swedish and for Finnish persons, speaking a fenno-ugric language. For Chinese students however, even after vast study of the Ekzercaro, it may be extremely difficult to get an idea of these general principles for sentence building, which Europeans have inherited from latin.

sudanglo (Wasifu wa mtumiaji) 19 Februari 2014 1:33:44 alasiri

So the conclusion is - Esperanto very easy for the educated or polyglot European but not for the oriental?

However there were certainly Japanese Esperantists in the early days.

And nowadays most educated orientals will have some knowledge of a European language, most likely English.

So maybe the 16 rules and the Ekzercaro are still sufficient, to grasp the essential grammar of Esperanto.

Kurudi juu