Meddelelser: 6
Sprog: English
johmue (Vise profilen) 8. mar. 2015 19.52.13
So here you go for the first part.
Alkanadi (Vise profilen) 9. mar. 2015 07.07.47
johmue:The podcast Language Rules about the world's languages had me as a guest to speak about Esperanto. As our conversation ended up three hours long Anett decided to make it two episodes.Cool. I really like when creators release their material with a creative commons license. Copyright is so archaic and non-relevant for today's media.
So here you go for the first part.
Soon everything will be creative commons because of the economic advantages. When you release things under a creative commons license, you are almost guaranteeing an army of free distributors, who will spread your brand far and wide.
RiotNrrd (Vise profilen) 10. mar. 2015 01.45.12
johmue (Vise profilen) 21. mar. 2015 20.28.11
johmue:The podcast Language Rules about the world's languages had me as a guest to speak about Esperanto. As our conversation ended up three hours long Anett decided to make it two episodes.Now here's the second part.
So here you go for the first part.
Don't hesitate to comment
orthohawk (Vise profilen) 22. mar. 2015 00.16.40
Alkanadi:I bet thee wouldn't say that if thee were an author dependent on royalties for thy income.
Cool. I really like when creators release their material with a creative commons license. Copyright is so archaic and non-relevant for today's media.
Alkanadi (Vise profilen) 22. mar. 2015 08.59.02
orthohawk:Creative Commons licensing doesn't necessarily mean that anyone can copy you. You set the terms. For example, some creative commons licenses state that nobody is allowed to copy any of your content. Some licenses say that non-comerical copyright is okay. There are different levels.Alkanadi:I bet thee wouldn't say that if thee were an author dependent on royalties for thy income.
Cool. I really like when creators release their material with a creative commons license. Copyright is so archaic and non-relevant for today's media.
Copyright law is archaic because it is very confusing when applied to software and digital media. Creative commons licensing is straight forward.
Also, I am a published author. I make royalties when other companies distribute my product. When I handle the distribution myself, I make profit.
I would prefer to use a creative commons license that tells people not to copy my work, however, the industry standard is the typical copyright system so I work within that frame work.