Đi đến phần nội dung

translation questions

viết bởi mfar, Ngày 09 tháng 5 năm 2016

Tin nhắn: 94

Nội dung: English

mfar (Xem thông tin cá nhân) 14:27:21 Ngày 09 tháng 5 năm 2016

Hope someone can clear this up for this beginner:
For the translation of the Confucian proverb - "It does not matter how slowly you go as long as you do not stop", the online translation I get is - " Ne gravas kiom malrapide vin iri tiel longe kiel vi ne haltas".

Why is the "you - vin" in the accusative and the "go - iri" in the infinitive?

Miland (Xem thông tin cá nhân) 14:32:47 Ngày 09 tháng 5 năm 2016

I would put it Ne gravas kiel malrapide vi iras, se nur vi ne haltas.

mfar (Xem thông tin cá nhân) 14:39:29 Ngày 09 tháng 5 năm 2016

I'm assuming you changed "kiom" to "kiel" because "kiom" only refers to quantity?

Alkanadi (Xem thông tin cá nhân) 15:26:25 Ngày 09 tháng 5 năm 2016

Kiom = How much in quantity?

Kiel = In what manner/style/way? In this case, the manner is slow.

Miland:I would put it Ne gravas kiel malrapide vi iras, se nur vi ne haltas.
Is it better to change vi to oni?

ludomastro (Xem thông tin cá nhân) 17:26:46 Ngày 09 tháng 5 năm 2016

mfar: ... the online translation ...
Be careful with the online translators. While Google translate does better than most at Esperanto (in my experience) it still has issues with complex sentence structure.

eshapard (Xem thông tin cá nhân) 18:10:38 Ngày 09 tháng 5 năm 2016

mfar:Hope someone can clear this up for this beginner:
For the translation of the Confucian proverb - "It does not matter how slowly you go as long as you do not stop", the online translation I get is - " Ne gravas kiom malrapide vin iri tiel longe kiel vi ne haltas".

Why is the "you - vin" in the accusative and the "go - iri" in the infinitive?
Because the translation algorithm guessed that 'vi' was the direct object of 'gravas' or 'iri' and because the infinitive version of a verb often follows after the non-infinitive version of another. (e.g. I volas ofte iri... ; I often want to go...).

Not bad guesses for a computer algorithm. In other sentences, they might have been correct.

e.g. Mi volas malrapide vin iri. I want to go [to] you slowly.

nornen (Xem thông tin cá nhân) 18:13:58 Ngày 09 tháng 5 năm 2016

eshapard:e.g. Mi volas malripide vin iri. I want to go [to] you slowly.
What does this mean?

eshapard (Xem thông tin cá nhân) 18:19:17 Ngày 09 tháng 5 năm 2016

nornen:
eshapard:e.g. Mi volas malripide vin iri. I want to go [to] you slowly.
What does this mean?
I'm not sure how to answer this, seeing how I provided the translation. I guess it could also mean "I slowly want to go to you".

Oh, oops, there was a typo. *malrapide

nornen (Xem thông tin cá nhân) 18:22:26 Ngày 09 tháng 5 năm 2016

eshapard:
nornen:
eshapard:e.g. Mi volas malripide vin iri. I want to go [to] you slowly.
What does this mean?
I'm not sure how to answer this, seeing how I provided the translation. I guess it could also mean "I slowly want to go to you".
Thank you. Is it common to use the accusative of direction with personal pronouns (or humans in general)?

eshapard (Xem thông tin cá nhân) 18:29:16 Ngày 09 tháng 5 năm 2016

nornen:
Thank you. Is it common to use the accusative of direction with personal pronouns (or humans in general)?
I don't know. I don't think I've seen it before; usually al vi. I just wanted to come up with a sentence that was very similar to the OP's, but where it made sense to use the accusative and the infintive.

If I had chosen another verb such as 'bati' (to beat), then I could have used the regular accusative instead of the accusative of direction.

Actually, I guess 'vin iri' could be more 'to go towards him', meaning in his direction (but not necessarily all the way to him), wheras 'al vi iri' is to go all the way to him. A slight difference, but maybe useful in some contexts.

Quay lại