Wpisy: 36
Język: English
Alkanadi (Pokaż profil) 12 czerwca 2016, 08:38:19
erinja:You don't really want others to make money off your work."NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes."
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
lagtendisto (Pokaż profil) 12 czerwca 2016, 10:05:29
rapn21 (Pokaż profil) 13 czerwca 2016, 10:55:02
Alkanadi: The benefit for you is that people will copy your blog. Then they will link back to you. People will copy it in a plethora of ways.I wouldn't want that. If someone likes my blog, they can simply link to it, they don't need to copy it on their site.
Alkanadi (Pokaż profil) 13 czerwca 2016, 11:03:39
rapn21:I wouldn't want that. If someone likes my blog, they can simply link to it, they don't need to copy it on their site.It is up to you. Maybe a better example would be a translation of your blog rather than an exact copy. Or, someone may take the written text and turn it into a podcast. I won't do any of these things but I just wanted to suggest it.
It can help spread your message further and help with SEO as well because people are forced to link back to the original source.
erinja (Pokaż profil) 14 czerwca 2016, 03:30:17
Alkanadi (Pokaż profil) 14 czerwca 2016, 09:28:17
erinja:You don't need to publish under a Creative Commons license to have people link to your stuff and read your blog.Isn't that stating the obvious?
erinja (Pokaż profil) 14 czerwca 2016, 16:15:21
Alkanadi (Pokaż profil) 15 czerwca 2016, 08:42:43
erinja:Therefore there is no point in giving special Creative Commons permissions, just so someone can copy your stuff and use your content to drive traffic to their own website rather than to yours.With all due respect, I don't think you understand how Creative Commons works. You didn't even know what a Non-Commercial license was until I showed you. If you don't know anything about Creative Commons then why are you making assertions about it?
Vestitor (Pokaż profil) 15 czerwca 2016, 09:57:57
There are loads of news organisations, as an example, who tolerate republishing of articles so long as a link to the original content is made. That's enough really. The strictest of the CC licenses is basically offering the same thing, but why bother when you have that anyway since a blog post is auto copyrighted and you just allow republishing with a link?
I'm not against CC licenses at all, but I don't like parasites who are salivating in the wings over content created by someone else's hard work; so they can use it for a quick repackaging job for an easy commercial opportunity. It also means that your content can easily turn up in places you might not want it to be.
Alkanadi (Pokaż profil) 15 czerwca 2016, 10:39:02
Vestitor:...but I don't like parasites who are salivating in the wings over content created by someone else's hard work; so they can use it for a quick repackaging job for an easy commercial opportunity.Then use a Non-Commercial license like Ted Talks does.
1- I have no intentions of using this particular blog, or any Esperanto related blog. Just in cause you were thinking that.
2- These salivating parasites can be used for your own benefit. It is like an internet megaphone to get your message out to a broader audience.
3- These salivating parasites can help you build legacy for your work. Your work will never die.
For your personal interest, check out Kevin Oleary's story about how he become a billionaire. I suspect you won't like it but it is something of interest.