Đi đến phần nội dung
Trả lời

Kudos to Wiktionary for including ‘auxlang’

viết bởi mkj1887, Ngày 22 tháng 5 năm 2017

Tin nhắn: 4

Nội dung: English

mkj1887 (Xem thông tin cá nhân) 23:00:30 Ngày 22 tháng 5 năm 2017

The word ‘auxlang’ occurs neither in Benson, nor in Wells, nor in Vikivortaro, nor in ReVo, nor in Sonja. Nor does it occur in Merriam-Webster. It does, however, occur in Wiktionary, so kudos to Wiktionary!

Vestitor (Xem thông tin cá nhân) 02:51:47 Ngày 23 tháng 5 năm 2017

Probably because its not an actual word. "Auxiliary-language" is not in standard dictionaries. Even Auxiliary-verb which is a fully recognised term is only a subentry of 'auxiliary'.

How come you don't heed the responses in these threads? The consensus is that it's neither necessary nor practical to have an official entry for every new coinage or slang word or dialect word or localism. In fact the way Esperanto works is the example: small base vocabulary that renders more than the sum of its parts.

An Esperantist ought to know better.

mkj1887 (Xem thông tin cá nhân) 12:37:21 Ngày 23 tháng 5 năm 2017

Vestitor:Probably because its not an actual word. "Auxiliary-language" is not in standard dictionaries. Even Auxiliary-verb which is a fully recognised term is only a subentry of 'auxiliary'.

How come you don't heed the responses in these threads? The consensus is that it's neither necessary nor practical to have an official entry for every new coinage or slang word or dialect word or localism. In fact the way Esperanto works is the example: small base vocabulary that renders more than the sum of its parts.

An Esperantist ought to know better.
Nothing was ever accomplished by a reasonable man.

Estas vi Esperantisto.

Vestitor (Xem thông tin cá nhân) 18:53:44 Ngày 23 tháng 5 năm 2017

Yes, that's surely at the root of it.

Quay lại