Kudos to Wiktionary for including ‘auxlang’
od mkj1887, 22 maja 2017
Wpisy: 4
Język: English
mkj1887 (Pokaż profil) 22 maja 2017, 23:00:30
Vestitor (Pokaż profil) 23 maja 2017, 02:51:47
How come you don't heed the responses in these threads? The consensus is that it's neither necessary nor practical to have an official entry for every new coinage or slang word or dialect word or localism. In fact the way Esperanto works is the example: small base vocabulary that renders more than the sum of its parts.
An Esperantist ought to know better.
mkj1887 (Pokaż profil) 23 maja 2017, 12:37:21
Vestitor:Probably because its not an actual word. "Auxiliary-language" is not in standard dictionaries. Even Auxiliary-verb which is a fully recognised term is only a subentry of 'auxiliary'.Nothing was ever accomplished by a reasonable man.
How come you don't heed the responses in these threads? The consensus is that it's neither necessary nor practical to have an official entry for every new coinage or slang word or dialect word or localism. In fact the way Esperanto works is the example: small base vocabulary that renders more than the sum of its parts.
An Esperantist ought to know better.
Estas vi Esperantisto.
Vestitor (Pokaż profil) 23 maja 2017, 18:53:44