去目錄頁

Question on sentence

Skully101, 2018年5月9日

讯息: 6

语言: English

Skully101 (显示个人资料) 2018年5月9日上午4:56:52

would
kiel estas vi fartas
be the same as
kiel vi fartas?
thank you!

sergejm (显示个人资料) 2018年5月9日上午5:17:15

kiel estas vi fartas - is incorrect
kiel vi fartas? - means: how do you do?

Skully101 (显示个人资料) 2018年5月10日上午1:06:39

how is kiel estas vi fartas incorrect?
don't you need to add how "are" you doing
to the sentence?

sergejm (显示个人资料) 2018年5月10日上午4:19:12

The phrase 'kiel estas vi fartas' with two '-as' is constructed as 'Is this is correct?' with two 'is'.

tommjames (显示个人资料) 2018年6月11日上午9:33:59

Skully101:"don't you need to add how "are" you doing"
As noted, no, and I would add that you need to try and avoid the tendency to translate things word-for-word from English into Esperanto like that. The use of auxiliary verbs like are ("how are you doing") and do ("how do you do") is an aspect of English that you will not necessarily see replicated in the 'equivalent' expressions employed in other languages.

Some similar examples:

What is he doing? → Kion li faras? (not "kion estas li faras?")
When is he coming? → Kiam li venos? (not "kiam estas li venos?")
What did she say? → Kion ŝi diris? (not "kion faris ŝi diris?)

Metsis (显示个人资料) 2018年6月13日上午6:08:12

Skully101,

Hear, hear. Tommjames is right. You need to understand, that certain constructs are specific to English and as such not used in other languages. Tommjames points out two such constructs: be + -ing and the need for auxliary "do" because of the inflexible word order of English. A third common case is the formal subject (again caused by the inflexible word order): It is raining (what is this "it"?). There are others.

回到上端