본문으로
댓글 쓰기

In the Land of Invented Languages

글쓴이: richardhall, 2009년 6월 1일

글: 43

언어: English

richardhall (프로필 보기) 2009년 6월 1일 오후 10:26:18

I've picked up on a bit of buzz about this book around the interweb. Has anyone here read it yet? And (if so) what did you think of it? The reviews I've read suggest that the author is sympathetic to Eo

Miland (프로필 보기) 2009년 6월 1일 오후 11:05:38

richardhall:.. The reviews I've read suggest that the author is sympathetic to Eo
I'm less sure. Her website's biography refers to "losers like Esperanto and Klingon", although she goes on to say:
"Initial feelings of pity and revulsion gave way to fascination and affection, and she embarked on a whirlwind romance with the history of invented languages. The love child of this passion is her book In the Land of Invented Languages."

roint (프로필 보기) 2009년 6월 2일 오후 4:12:40

I almost majored in linguistics in college, until I realized that my chances for a job afterward would be next to nothing. I'm glad now that I didn't, or else I'd have to write a condescending novel made entirely of century-old fears and misconceptions.

Congratulations to Arika Okrent, the Carlos Mencia of linguists.

richardhall (프로필 보기) 2009년 6월 2일 오후 4:18:34

roint:Congratulations to Arika Okrent, the Carlos Mencia of linguists.
You didn't think much of it, then?

hiyayaywhopee (프로필 보기) 2009년 6월 2일 오후 4:59:23

I thought I might want to major in linguistics until the first day of classes a year ago when the professor told us that Esperanto was a dead language invented some time ago by a team of French people and used it as an example of how only "naturally-evolving" languages could ever work. Needless to say, that turned me off from the discipline pretty quickly, and my personal theory that linguistics consists mainly of whatever BS you feel has to be right was never discounted.

I thought I read an interview of this Arika Okrent that made her seem decent enough, but I can't find it so I may just be imagining things.

Rogir (프로필 보기) 2009년 6월 2일 오후 8:11:41

Looks like he confused Esperanto and Ido then.

Miland (프로필 보기) 2009년 6월 2일 오후 8:14:19

Rogir:Looks like he confused Esperanto and Ido then.
Good one! rido.gif

ceigered (프로필 보기) 2009년 6월 3일 오전 7:59:02

hiyayaywhopee:Needless to say, that turned me off from the discipline pretty quickly, and my personal theory that linguistics consists mainly of whatever BS you feel has to be right was never discounted.
Mmm I have similar sentiments. I think linguistics can often be like philosophy at times. Whatever sounds good said by a guy who looks like he knows what he is saying (even if he doesn't) is accepted ridulo.gif

Did you proceed to politely inform the professor that you were "in possession of conflicting information which could POSSIBLY, just possibly challenge his preconceptions"? ridulo.gif

Rogir (프로필 보기) 2009년 6월 3일 오후 12:03:17

I was in an introductory Linguistics class together with one other Esperantist, but the subject wasn't mentioned except when the other claimed Esperanto is not an Indo-European language, and the teacher said it was. And to be honest, I think they both have a point.

tommjames (프로필 보기) 2009년 6월 3일 오후 12:13:27

ceigered:Whatever sounds good said by a guy who looks like he knows what he is saying (even if he doesn't) is accepted ridulo.gif
That reminds me of when Noam Chomsky declared Esperanto to be "not a language". I guess that depends on how you define language. Perhaps Esperanto is something else (according to his models anyway), but I think it serves as a useful reminder that linguistics at its most "advanced" can often amount to little more than dogma. I for one take these guys with a pinch of salt.

다시 위로