Tästä sisältöön
Vastaa

Rekta metodo for future civilisations

Miland :lta, 2. kesäkuuta 2009

Viestejä: 10

Kieli: English

Miland (Näytä profiilli) 2. kesäkuuta 2009 9.17.54

Russ:To be genuinely useful for teaching a forgotten language to future civilizations..A simple picture dictionary showing basic concepts like "viro", "virino", "hundo", "unu", "du", "tri", etc..
Rogir:..why not engrave a lot of granite sheets with a book version of the Rekta metodo, and then add a literary classic..
Both worth considering. The question is, how long can artefacts outlast the ravages of nature - the growth of jungles, earthquakes, robbery etc? The paintings of Lascaux, the seals and coins of Mohenjo-Daro and the pyramids -minus their marble covering, stripped by palace builders - seem to be the oldest artefacts we have. Do these provide clues as how to go about the task?

jan aleksan (Näytä profiilli) 2. kesäkuuta 2009 10.10.41

Why not using something else than stone, like titanium, or aluminium.

But maybe the best solution is the graphene

richardhall (Näytä profiilli) 2. kesäkuuta 2009 10.48.34

Depositing something on the moon would avoid any issues with weathering.

Rogir (Näytä profiilli) 2. kesäkuuta 2009 12.47.46

But I consider it unlikely that after the destruction of civilization there will be any people left on the moon.

richardhall (Näytä profiilli) 2. kesäkuuta 2009 14.14.28

Rogir:But I consider it unlikely that after the destruction of civilization there will be any people left on the moon.
There is that!

jan aleksan (Näytä profiilli) 2. kesäkuuta 2009 15.08.04

Rogir:But I consider it unlikely that after the destruction of civilization there will be any people left on the moon.
You're right, so we need to make the moon fall on the earth slowly, before the destruction of civilisation lango.gif

Miland (Näytä profiilli) 2. kesäkuuta 2009 18.51.05

* placed in the thread "Timecapsule caches and restarting civilisation" *

russ (Näytä profiilli) 3. kesäkuuta 2009 5.31.56

Rogir:But I consider it unlikely that after the destruction of civilization there will be any people left on the moon.
So it depends on the goal of this project: Is it to help raise a collapsed civilization from the ashes? Or is it to pass on the secret advanced knowledge to another civilization when it has proven itself sufficiently ready to use it? (E.g. the monolith on the moon in 2001: A Space Odyssey.) ridulo.gif

ceigered (Näytä profiilli) 3. kesäkuuta 2009 7.37.18

Or do we just wanna move to the moon?

Donniedillon (Näytä profiilli) 3. kesäkuuta 2009 17.56.45

I vote for moving to the moon and so does Stephen Hawking.

Takaisin ylös