Wpisy: 5
Język: English
Darzaire (Pokaż profil) 16 września 2009, 03:05:26
Now, Esperanto is nice and all, being so simple, but does it suffer from a lack of such word expression? I haven't learned much Esperanto yet, but it sounds like it would be a very bland language, with little to offer in the way of special expression.
vejktoro (Pokaż profil) 16 września 2009, 03:45:02
Because of Esperanto's power system of word creation and license in word order, proficient writers use the language in very expressive ways. Entire phrases can be put to one word, or one word expanded as a phrase.
I, like you, enjoy artistic expression and I have not been let down one little bit by the offerings I've found in Esperanto poetry and literature. And there's lots of it, so you've a wealth of material to discover once your ability increases.
Of course, when it comes to two people of different language backgrounds simply communicating, well, simplicity wins and the most straight forward Esperanto is preferred.
Oŝo-Jabe (Pokaż profil) 16 września 2009, 04:18:33
If you get the chance you should read the story Reĝidino Mal. It's an amusing story, and a good example of what a writer can do with Esperanto.
tommjames (Pokaż profil) 16 września 2009, 09:41:24
Darzaire:Now, Esperanto is nice and all, being so simple, but does it suffer from a lack of such word expression?Having many thousands of words each one with their own unique nuance seems to me just one of many ways a language may be considered "expressive". If Esperanto does suffer from a lack of roots (personally I consider it possible but not especially significant), then as others have pointed out it more than makes up for it with its morphological and syntactic freedom. Personally I think Esperanto is a far more expressive language than English.
russ (Pokaż profil) 16 września 2009, 10:11:49
Of course if, for you, a big vocabulary of exotic roots is necessary for artistic expression, there are plenty of neologisms and when you gain experience and knowledge you can create your own which might work. But that's not as in the spirit of the language, IMHO.