erinja:I'm not against adding explanations to the dictionary. I just don't want people to be under the (false) impression that the lernu dictionary is the best there is, or that the lernu dictionary should be providing a lot in the way of grammatical explanations.

Ah I see. I wasn't sure whether you meant that it shouldn't be a substitute, or that it isn't a substitute but might one day have the potential.

I'll attempt to add it, if anyone wants to check to make sure the definition (Eng->EO) still flows, let me know if doesn't.

ceigered:Ah I see. I wasn't sure whether you meant that it shouldn't be a substitute, or that it isn't a substitute but might one day have the potential.

Actually my precise point was that I am personally too apathetic and lazy to do it. I just don't care enough to bother doing it. But I have no problem with someone else doing it (and please do feel free to add explanations to dictionary definitions, as you see fit)

erinja:

ceigered:Ah I see. I wasn't sure whether you meant that it shouldn't be a substitute, or that it isn't a substitute but might one day have the potential.

Actually my precise point was that I am personally too apathetic and lazy to do it. I just don't care enough to bother doing it. But I have no problem with someone else doing it (and please do feel free to add explanations to dictionary definitions, as you see fit)

Haha! Oh well, your life is probably quite busy (at least a heck of a lot busier than mine) so that's fair understandable. Sorry about that misunderstanding