본문으로

Eo variation, is there one ?

글쓴이: EoMy, 2011년 2월 14일

글: 5

언어: English

EoMy (프로필 보기) 2011년 2월 14일 오후 3:24:03

I was reading the magazine of World Englishes. There stated the variation of English in various places like Africa etc.

I just wonder Esperanto does accept this kind of variation which i felt irritated. If there is a change, why it is still called English.

I hope Esperanto would not have that kind of variation but accent would be fine as i watched the youtube short films and i could understand the north,south, east, west esperantists talking about it.

sudanglo (프로필 보기) 2011년 2월 14일 오후 9:24:45

Among the Esperantists there is a tradition (which goes back a long way) of policing the language, precisely to prevent it breaking up into dialects.

In addition, there are standardizing influences which come from the fact that the language is used internationally.

In my experience, the main differences in usage among Esperanto speakers are to be found in the language used by beginners and that used by experienced speakers.

NothingHere (프로필 보기) 2011년 2월 14일 오후 11:18:40

I think the closest thing Esperanto has to a dialect is Ido, but the speakers of that language tend to assert that Esperanto and Ido are two different languages, not dialects of one another.

ceigered (프로필 보기) 2011년 2월 15일 오전 4:27:02

Sociolects, subculturolects (I dunno if that's a valid word), but no proper dialects. Ido's a bit too diverged to be called a dialect since its core vocabulary is the one left most changed.

EoMy (프로필 보기) 2011년 2월 15일 오후 4:30:48

Thanks, in summary, I can say that Esperanto has the least variations. I need the info to let my friends know as they have seen many versions of English in the word programmes too.

sal.gif

다시 위로