إلى المحتويات

Conlangs (Falsaj Lingvoj)

من dafyddmabblaidd, 23 أبريل، 2012

المشاركات: 26

لغة: English

dafyddmabblaidd (عرض الملف الشخصي) 23 أبريل، 2012 4:49:51 م

Who would like to join me in creating a conlang with roots deriving from Lojban, Loglan, Esperanto, Ido, Universal, and Volapük...and any others that you want to suggest/add to. =)

This page is blank, summoning you to inscribe your thoughts and words! =)

feel free to add ANY input you like,,, ciao!

Fenris_kcf (عرض الملف الشخصي) 23 أبريل، 2012 5:41:48 م

You do know that the vocabulary of all the languages listed above is a posteriori?

EDIT: Maybe you should describe your idea a little bit more detailed. What basic principles will your language have? What makes it better or worse?

bartlett22183 (عرض الملف الشخصي) 23 أبريل، 2012 6:51:52 م

Esperanto is a conlang. Is it a falsa lingvo?

Evildela (عرض الملف الشخصي) 23 أبريل، 2012 9:41:02 م

This forum is designed for the learning Esperanto, not for designing a conlang.

robbkvasnak (عرض الملف الشخصي) 23 أبريل، 2012 11:46:12 م

Inventing a new conlang is soooo beginner! If the beginner can get to the middle stage of speaking and writing Esperanto, then she/he usually gives up these ideas.

erinja (عرض الملف الشخصي) 24 أبريل، 2012 12:11:34 ص

Yes, the main purpose of this particular forum is to discuss, in English, topics relating to Esperanto - not other conlangs. If you would like to discuss other conlangs, I suggest that you start a thread in one of the Esperanto forums.

Or if you would like to discuss other conlangs in English, I suggest going to a forum like Unilang.

Hyperboreus (عرض الملف الشخصي) 24 أبريل، 2012 12:20:45 ص

Forigite

Fenris_kcf (عرض الملف الشخصي) 24 أبريل، 2012 1:10:59 ص

Hyperboreus:
robbkvasnak:Inventing a new conlang is soooo beginner! If the beginner can get to the middle stage of speaking and writing Esperanto, then she/he usually gives up these ideas.
Buggrit. This means I haven't come to the middle stage of Esperanto. Having brain farts about con langs and how they should look like, and what the shouldn't and this and that and etc, is quite fun for me still. Not as much as inventing a conlang, but playing in the mind with different aspects, approaches or philosophies of conlangs.
this! same here

It helps to understand certain aspects of human languages in general.

sudanglo (عرض الملف الشخصي) 24 أبريل، 2012 10:16:29 ص

Have you got 40 years to devote to developing your project, recruiting speakers, getting course books published, organising conferences of speakers, translating literature, establishing dictionaries based on agreed usage etc.?

Arguably, Esperanto which appeared in 1887, didn't get to the point of being a 'real' language until the 1930's after a lot of collaborative effort by a lot of people.

Remember, a language is essentially a social phenomenon, not just a bunch of rules.

You can have a language spoken just by one or two people that is a proper language, when it is on the point of dying out.

But this necessitates a previous community of speakers in which there was social consensus about meaning and usage, what counts as being well-formed etc., all of which is still remembered by the last remaining speakers.

razlem (عرض الملف الشخصي) 24 أبريل، 2012 2:41:03 م

sudanglo:Have you got 40 years to devote to developing your project, recruiting speakers, getting course books published, organising conferences of speakers, translating literature, establishing dictionaries based on agreed usage etc.?

Arguably, Esperanto which appeared in 1887, didn't get to the point of being a 'real' language until the 1930's after a lot of collaborative effort by a lot of people.
That was the era before mass communication. Nowadays you can send any amount of information to billions of people for free in the blink of an eye.

عودة للاعلى