Til indholdet

Conlangs (Falsaj Lingvoj)

af dafyddmabblaidd, 23. apr. 2012

Meddelelser: 26

Sprog: English

dafyddmabblaidd (Vise profilen) 23. apr. 2012 16.49.51

Who would like to join me in creating a conlang with roots deriving from Lojban, Loglan, Esperanto, Ido, Universal, and Volapük...and any others that you want to suggest/add to. =)

This page is blank, summoning you to inscribe your thoughts and words! =)

feel free to add ANY input you like,,, ciao!

Fenris_kcf (Vise profilen) 23. apr. 2012 17.41.48

You do know that the vocabulary of all the languages listed above is a posteriori?

EDIT: Maybe you should describe your idea a little bit more detailed. What basic principles will your language have? What makes it better or worse?

bartlett22183 (Vise profilen) 23. apr. 2012 18.51.52

Esperanto is a conlang. Is it a falsa lingvo?

Evildela (Vise profilen) 23. apr. 2012 21.41.02

This forum is designed for the learning Esperanto, not for designing a conlang.

robbkvasnak (Vise profilen) 23. apr. 2012 23.46.12

Inventing a new conlang is soooo beginner! If the beginner can get to the middle stage of speaking and writing Esperanto, then she/he usually gives up these ideas.

erinja (Vise profilen) 24. apr. 2012 00.11.34

Yes, the main purpose of this particular forum is to discuss, in English, topics relating to Esperanto - not other conlangs. If you would like to discuss other conlangs, I suggest that you start a thread in one of the Esperanto forums.

Or if you would like to discuss other conlangs in English, I suggest going to a forum like Unilang.

Hyperboreus (Vise profilen) 24. apr. 2012 00.20.45

Forigite

Fenris_kcf (Vise profilen) 24. apr. 2012 01.10.59

Hyperboreus:
robbkvasnak:Inventing a new conlang is soooo beginner! If the beginner can get to the middle stage of speaking and writing Esperanto, then she/he usually gives up these ideas.
Buggrit. This means I haven't come to the middle stage of Esperanto. Having brain farts about con langs and how they should look like, and what the shouldn't and this and that and etc, is quite fun for me still. Not as much as inventing a conlang, but playing in the mind with different aspects, approaches or philosophies of conlangs.
this! same here

It helps to understand certain aspects of human languages in general.

sudanglo (Vise profilen) 24. apr. 2012 10.16.29

Have you got 40 years to devote to developing your project, recruiting speakers, getting course books published, organising conferences of speakers, translating literature, establishing dictionaries based on agreed usage etc.?

Arguably, Esperanto which appeared in 1887, didn't get to the point of being a 'real' language until the 1930's after a lot of collaborative effort by a lot of people.

Remember, a language is essentially a social phenomenon, not just a bunch of rules.

You can have a language spoken just by one or two people that is a proper language, when it is on the point of dying out.

But this necessitates a previous community of speakers in which there was social consensus about meaning and usage, what counts as being well-formed etc., all of which is still remembered by the last remaining speakers.

razlem (Vise profilen) 24. apr. 2012 14.41.03

sudanglo:Have you got 40 years to devote to developing your project, recruiting speakers, getting course books published, organising conferences of speakers, translating literature, establishing dictionaries based on agreed usage etc.?

Arguably, Esperanto which appeared in 1887, didn't get to the point of being a 'real' language until the 1930's after a lot of collaborative effort by a lot of people.
That was the era before mass communication. Nowadays you can send any amount of information to billions of people for free in the blink of an eye.

Tilbage til start