讯息: 8
语言: English
Cisksje (显示个人资料) 2012年12月15日下午2:00:25
tommjames (显示个人资料) 2012年12月15日下午2:11:22
Some people don't like using "kio" because they feel it invites a response along the line of "it's a word I use to identify myself". There are also those who don't like "kiu" because they feel it suggests a group of names out of which you select your own. But the truth is both ways of asking it are valid and are in use, so it's not worth worrying about.
Chainy (显示个人资料) 2012年12月15日下午3:28:14
tommjames:Both "Kio estas via nomo?" and "Kiu estas via nomo?" are correct. You might also use "Kiel vi nomiĝas?"+1
Some people don't like using "kio" because they feel it invites a response along the line of "it's a word I use to identify myself". There are also those who don't like "kiu" because they feel it suggests a group of names out of which you select your own. But the truth is both ways of asking it are valid and are in use, so it's not worth worrying about.
Very nice answer, succinct and accurate. This should go in the grammar FAQ here.
Cisksje (显示个人资料) 2012年12月15日下午6:52:43
tommjames:Both "Kio estas via nomo?" and "Kiu estas via nomo?" are correct. You might also use "Kiel vi nomiĝas?"Thanks for that. I do not remember ever having heard 'kiu' used in this context before.
Some people don't like using "kio" because they feel it invites a response along the line of "it's a word I use to identify myself". There are also those who don't like "kiu" because they feel it suggests a group of names out of which you select your own. But the truth is both ways of asking it are valid and are in use, so it's not worth worrying about.
Roberto12 (显示个人资料) 2012年12月15日下午7:52:45
erinja (显示个人资料) 2012年12月16日上午3:06:47
"kio" can't be made plural, and it can be expressed together with plural things.
For example, the following question and answer are considered correct:
Kio estas tio?
Tio estas tri bananoj.
Roberto12 (显示个人资料) 2012年12月16日上午10:42:42