پستها: 10
زبان: English
lagwagon555 (نمایش مشخصات) 13 نوامبر 2007، 21:16:46
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/List_of_Wikipedias
Volapuk has made it into the list of 100,000+ articles, compared to Esperanto's 90,000... last time I looked it was like like 5,000 articles. Some translation bot maybe?
Although look at article depth, Volapuk has 2, which is like a sentence a page. Still, its not doing Esperanto any favours. Time to me to browse through thousands of Volapuk articles I dont understand, deleting the articles with only a few words...
Matthieu (نمایش مشخصات) 13 نوامبر 2007، 21:34:19
The Volapük Wikipedia has so much articles because, although very few people speak it, a bot is creating thousands of geographical stubs. Click the link “Random page” to see.
BasCostBudde (نمایش مشخصات) 13 نوامبر 2007، 21:46:55
Negative attention still is attention.
lagwagon555 (نمایش مشخصات) 13 نوامبر 2007، 22:19:00
It makes me wonder as well... although all Esperanto wikipedia articles look very well done, and in depth, but I wonder if any were created by bots?
mnlg (نمایش مشخصات) 13 نوامبر 2007، 23:12:00
lagwagon555:It makes me wonder as well... although all Esperanto wikipedia articles look very well done, and in depth, but I wonder if any were created by bots?Well, I initiated the Wikipedia article about Marco Polo in Esperanto (in 2004 or 2005, I can't remember), and that article at some point attained star status (much to the merit of following contributors, I am fairly sure).
So, perhaps 89,999+ were created by bots, but at least one wasn't
![ridulo.gif](/images/smileys/ridulo.gif)
ehanson (نمایش مشخصات) 16 نوامبر 2007، 22:50:31
cirko (نمایش مشخصات) 24 نوامبر 2007، 20:17:19
20-30 speakers? there are more Esperanto speakers on this website alone. I don't think we have anything to worry about haha.
lagwagon555 (نمایش مشخصات) 25 نوامبر 2007، 10:33:40
Joop (نمایش مشخصات) 2 دسامبر 2007، 23:38:33
Stefano B (نمایش مشخصات) 6 دسامبر 2007، 21:23:09