讯息: 10
语言: English
lagwagon555 (显示个人资料) 2007年11月13日下午9:16:46
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/List_of_Wikipedias
Volapuk has made it into the list of 100,000+ articles, compared to Esperanto's 90,000... last time I looked it was like like 5,000 articles. Some translation bot maybe?
Although look at article depth, Volapuk has 2, which is like a sentence a page. Still, its not doing Esperanto any favours. Time to me to browse through thousands of Volapuk articles I dont understand, deleting the articles with only a few words...
BasCostBudde (显示个人资料) 2007年11月13日下午9:46:55
Negative attention still is attention.
lagwagon555 (显示个人资料) 2007年11月13日下午10:19:00
It makes me wonder as well... although all Esperanto wikipedia articles look very well done, and in depth, but I wonder if any were created by bots?
mnlg (显示个人资料) 2007年11月13日下午11:12:00
lagwagon555:It makes me wonder as well... although all Esperanto wikipedia articles look very well done, and in depth, but I wonder if any were created by bots?Well, I initiated the Wikipedia article about Marco Polo in Esperanto (in 2004 or 2005, I can't remember), and that article at some point attained star status (much to the merit of following contributors, I am fairly sure).
So, perhaps 89,999+ were created by bots, but at least one wasn't
![ridulo.gif](/images/smileys/ridulo.gif)
ehanson (显示个人资料) 2007年11月16日下午10:50:31
cirko (显示个人资料) 2007年11月24日下午8:17:19
20-30 speakers? there are more Esperanto speakers on this website alone. I don't think we have anything to worry about haha.
lagwagon555 (显示个人资料) 2007年11月25日上午10:33:40
Joop (显示个人资料) 2007年12月2日下午11:38:33
Stefano B (显示个人资料) 2007年12月6日下午9:23:09