Поруке: 10
Језик: English
lagwagon555 (Погледати профил) 13. новембар 2007. 21.16.46
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/List_of_Wikipedias
Volapuk has made it into the list of 100,000+ articles, compared to Esperanto's 90,000... last time I looked it was like like 5,000 articles. Some translation bot maybe?
Although look at article depth, Volapuk has 2, which is like a sentence a page. Still, its not doing Esperanto any favours. Time to me to browse through thousands of Volapuk articles I dont understand, deleting the articles with only a few words...
Matthieu (Погледати профил) 13. новембар 2007. 21.34.19
The Volapük Wikipedia has so much articles because, although very few people speak it, a bot is creating thousands of geographical stubs. Click the link “Random page” to see.
BasCostBudde (Погледати профил) 13. новембар 2007. 21.46.55
Negative attention still is attention.
lagwagon555 (Погледати профил) 13. новембар 2007. 22.19.00
It makes me wonder as well... although all Esperanto wikipedia articles look very well done, and in depth, but I wonder if any were created by bots?
mnlg (Погледати профил) 13. новембар 2007. 23.12.00
lagwagon555:It makes me wonder as well... although all Esperanto wikipedia articles look very well done, and in depth, but I wonder if any were created by bots?Well, I initiated the Wikipedia article about Marco Polo in Esperanto (in 2004 or 2005, I can't remember), and that article at some point attained star status (much to the merit of following contributors, I am fairly sure).
So, perhaps 89,999+ were created by bots, but at least one wasn't
![ridulo.gif](/images/smileys/ridulo.gif)
ehanson (Погледати профил) 16. новембар 2007. 22.50.31
cirko (Погледати профил) 24. новембар 2007. 20.17.19
20-30 speakers? there are more Esperanto speakers on this website alone. I don't think we have anything to worry about haha.
lagwagon555 (Погледати профил) 25. новембар 2007. 10.33.40
Joop (Погледати профил) 02. децембар 2007. 23.38.33
Stefano B (Погледати профил) 06. децембар 2007. 21.23.09