Over 50% of Esperanto speakers are above average intelligence
viết bởi Alkanadi, Ngày 22 tháng 2 năm 2015
Tin nhắn: 27
Nội dung: English
Alkanadi (Xem thông tin cá nhân) 16:11:34 Ngày 22 tháng 2 năm 2015
Scratch:It all depends on the distribution. Let's say for example we have 5 people with IQ values of 3, 4, 5, 5, 6, 10. Their average IQ would be 33/6 or 5.5. Only 2 of the 5 has above-average intelligence. Everyone else is below average.Yah. You are right. I was assuming that a large population would marginalize an uneven distribution. But, you are right. It will never be exactly half.
nornen (Xem thông tin cá nhân) 16:16:13 Ngày 22 tháng 2 năm 2015
Alkanadi:It is by definition. If you have an IQ Test and after testing your sample set, the median is NOT 100, then either the test is crap or it is not an IQ test.Scratch:It all depends on the distribution. Let's say for example we have 5 people with IQ values of 3, 4, 5, 5, 6, 10. Their average IQ would be 33/6 or 5.5. Only 2 of the 5 has above-average intelligence. Everyone else is below average.Yah. You are right. I was assuming that a large population would marginalize an uneven distribution. But, you are right. It will never be exactly half.
Scratch (Xem thông tin cá nhân) 17:56:03 Ngày 22 tháng 2 năm 2015
nornen:I learned something new today. I didn't realize that IQ scores were standarized and normalized. In that sense, I am wrong. But I don't know how to regard the idea of standardizing and normalizing that way.Scratch:Their average IQ would be 33/6 or 5.5.Wrong again. The median IQ of a given set is by definition 100. Its standard deviation is 15. By definition. It is "standardized" and "normalized".
What you are saying is like: "Let's say we have a set of 5 red balls, out of which 3 are blue." Contradiction in terms.
Of course, I still don't know if that really means we can say that half the population is in fact smarter than the rest, or that half the population is less intelligent. Along with the whole host of problems in what kinds of intelligence do IQ tests measure.
robbkvasnak (Xem thông tin cá nhân) 18:21:06 Ngày 22 tháng 2 năm 2015
So there is, me thinks, something going for Esperantists, hehe.
kaŝperanto (Xem thông tin cá nhân) 19:12:33 Ngày 23 tháng 2 năm 2015
robbkvasnak (Xem thông tin cá nhân) 19:41:34 Ngày 23 tháng 2 năm 2015
Alkanadi (Xem thông tin cá nhân) 06:47:40 Ngày 24 tháng 2 năm 2015
kaŝperanto:I would put money on Esperantists coming primarily from the high side of the bell curve.I would agree with that. I can't imagine someone from the bottom of the curve would take on such a project.
But it also depends whether we are talking about left or right brain intelligence. Or, even more specifically, which areas of the brain we are talking about.
Then again, there are some autistic people who are incredibly skilled at learning languages, but I am not sure how well they would score on an IQ test.
kaŝperanto (Xem thông tin cá nhân) 17:18:06 Ngày 24 tháng 2 năm 2015
Alkanadi:I would put language learning almost as an equal-opportunity subject for the brain types. It is in fact one subject that all of our brains are made to understand (at least for healthy people). Right brainers have an advantage in learning/deducing the logical patterns and structure of the language, while left brainers have the creative/artistic edge. I would also say that the logical/regular aspects of Esperanto are not especially helpful when moving from beginner to intermediate/advanced levels. At some point you have to think/feel in the language.kaŝperanto:I would put money on Esperantists coming primarily from the high side of the bell curve.I would agree with that. I can't imagine someone from the bottom of the curve would take on such a project.
But it also depends whether we are talking about left or right brain intelligence. Or, even more specifically, which areas of the brain we are talking about.
Then again, there are some autistic people who are incredibly skilled at learning languages, but I am not sure how well they would score on an IQ test.
IQ tests are iffy in their relevance to actual intelligence, but as I understand it they are useful in certain fields of study. It is my feeling that intelligence capability is probably about the same for most people, while the desire/belief required to apply and grow that intelligence is what varies greatly.
sudanglo (Xem thông tin cá nhân) 10:43:51 Ngày 25 tháng 2 năm 2015
The logic is that as long as Esperantujo is perceived as a club for weirdo's, it will discourage 'normals' from joining and prevents Esperanto from going mainstream.
So it has nothing to do with whether per se it is a good or a bad thing to be 'unusual'.
Kirilo81 (Xem thông tin cá nhân) 13:44:01 Ngày 25 tháng 2 năm 2015
It seems to me the Esperantists' image of the image of Esperanto is wrong.