去目錄頁

what happend with gxangalo.com ?

ravana, 2015年8月8日

讯息: 26

语言: English

ravana (显示个人资料) 2015年8月8日下午8:41:04

It was very good created esperanto site but it closed few years ago . Why ?

Polaris (显示个人资料) 2015年8月9日上午4:30:12

ravana:It was very good created esperanto site but it closed few years ago . Why ?
I wonder the same thing. I loved that site---so disappointed when it disappeared.

vejktoro (显示个人资料) 2015年8月9日上午4:40:52

It was way too much work for very little money. Same as the TV project.

And we all want everything for free.

vejktoro (显示个人资料) 2015年8月9日上午4:56:28

Alkanadi (显示个人资料) 2015年8月9日上午6:28:56

What did you use this website for? What was the point of it?

Maybe, someone can recreate a similar type of site.

ravana (显示个人资料) 2015年8月9日上午6:52:35

In that time lernu did not exist so it was the best way to practice esperanto . It had everything , from news to chat .

Alkanadi (显示个人资料) 2015年8月9日上午6:54:59

ravana:In that time lernu did not exist so it was the best way to practice esperanto . It had everything , from news to chat .
What type of chat feature did it have? Was it like instant messenger? Did it include voice? Was it just a normal forum?

ravana (显示个人资料) 2015年8月9日上午7:03:56

I realy do not rimember all the detals but it was very profesional i thik that it had even e-mail . Tipical portal on a high level .

vejktoro (显示个人资料) 2015年8月9日上午7:19:47

Lernu did exist.

Gxangalo was the best Eo site that ever existed. It was an online magazine.. current events, human interest, lifestyle.. all that.
But, it was higher level text. It was not easy for those just learning. Flavio insisted on keeping the language level for the fluent. At the time I remember thinking he might have more readers if there was a beginner section.

Alkanadi (显示个人资料) 2015年8月9日上午7:53:14

vejktoro:Gxangalo was the best Eo site that ever existed. It was an online magazine.. current events, human interest, lifestyle.. all that.
But, it was higher level text. It was not easy for those just learning. Flavio insisted on keeping the language level for the fluent. At the time I remember thinking he might have more readers if there was a beginner section.
It sounds like it was like BBC for Esperanto with an added chat feature.

I guess it was too costly to hire writers for that kind of thing.

回到上端