Messages: 4
Language: English
Miland (User's profile) February 22, 2008, 1:24:23 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balaibalan
It would be interesting to know whether a semitic constructed language would be easier to learn than E-o, for people without relevant backgrounds for either. The trouble is that any attempt at comparison would be confounded by the world-wide prevalence of English as a second or professional language.
erinja (User's profile) February 23, 2008, 4:15:09 PM
Miland (User's profile) February 23, 2008, 4:56:40 PM
erinja:I wonder which language family the grammar followed?)The wiki article says 'simplified Arabic', perhaps a semitic version of Latino sine flexione.
But it appears to have been devised by a mystical sect for its own purposes, and so might be less suitable as an all-purpose language which E-o is intended to be.
Mendacapote (User's profile) February 23, 2008, 6:34:53 PM