讯息: 4
语言: English
Miland (显示个人资料) 2008年2月22日下午1:24:23
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balaibalan
It would be interesting to know whether a semitic constructed language would be easier to learn than E-o, for people without relevant backgrounds for either. The trouble is that any attempt at comparison would be confounded by the world-wide prevalence of English as a second or professional language.
erinja (显示个人资料) 2008年2月23日下午4:15:09
Miland (显示个人资料) 2008年2月23日下午4:56:40
erinja:I wonder which language family the grammar followed?)The wiki article says 'simplified Arabic', perhaps a semitic version of Latino sine flexione.
But it appears to have been devised by a mystical sect for its own purposes, and so might be less suitable as an all-purpose language which E-o is intended to be.
Mendacapote (显示个人资料) 2008年2月23日下午6:34:53