an embarrassing omission from Vikipedio: ‘thesaurus’
от mkj1887, 22 януари 2017
Съобщения: 14
Език: English
mkj1887 (Покажи профила) 22 януари 2017, 17:26:11
Fenris_kcf (Покажи профила) 22 януари 2017, 18:30:36
mkj1887 (Покажи профила) 22 януари 2017, 18:40:53
Fenris_kcf:You know that you can create the article and add the link you long for?Reporting a problem and fixing a problem are two different functionalities, and are best performed by different entities (much like in a software house, where the testing department does not fix the bugs that they find – the programming department does that). In the works of others, I confine myself to reporting problems I encounter. I reserve my creative efforts for my own website.
Fenris_kcf (Покажи профила) 22 януари 2017, 18:45:02
mkj1887 (Покажи профила) 23 януари 2017, 01:48:45
Fenris_kcf:So to whom do you emit your complaint? Who is responsible for the embarrassing disgrace?It’s addressed to the visitors to this site, except for any idiotic trolls.
Vestitor (Покажи профила) 23 януари 2017, 14:04:45
mkj1887 (Покажи профила) 23 януари 2017, 16:52:07
Vestitor:So now Fenris is also a "troll" for pointing out the obvious. Your reply to him makes no sense anyway since the very point of Wikipedia is that it is both created and edited by everyone. Most articles are the work of multiple authors. Why not contribute?As Noam Chomsky replied to me when I tried to get him to take an interest in Esperanto: “We all have our priorities, otherwise life would not be possible. I’m sorry I cannot satisfy you on this score.”
The_Nice_Guy (Покажи профила) 23 януари 2017, 18:04:45
It's the Esperanto equivalent of this English article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thesaurus_(informati...
Copy/paste the parentheses exactly or click the link at the top in italics.
I wonder if the Esperanto article should be moved and/or edited so it corresponds with the English article about "general/literary applications."
Vestitor (Покажи профила) 23 януари 2017, 23:01:18
mkj1887:Well in this case it's not about satisfying me. I'm not the one bemoaning the omission of a trifling Wikipedia article. In any case it's hardly comparable with trying to get Chomsky interested in Esperanto; a foolish escapade if ever there was one.Vestitor:So now Fenris is also a "troll" for pointing out the obvious. Your reply to him makes no sense anyway since the very point of Wikipedia is that it is both created and edited by everyone. Most articles are the work of multiple authors. Why not contribute?As Noam Chomsky replied to me when I tried to get him to take an interest in Esperanto: “We all have our priorities, otherwise life would not be possible. I’m sorry I cannot satisfy you on this score.”
mkj1887 (Покажи профила) 24 януари 2017, 19:01:11
Vestitor:Trying to talk sense to you is a foolish escapade if there ever was one. Estas vi Esperantisto.mkj1887:Well in this case it's not about satisfying me. I'm not the one bemoaning the omission of a trifling Wikipedia article. In any case it's hardly comparable with trying to get Chomsky interested in Esperanto; a foolish escapade if ever there was one.Vestitor:So now Fenris is also a "troll" for pointing out the obvious. Your reply to him makes no sense anyway since the very point of Wikipedia is that it is both created and edited by everyone. Most articles are the work of multiple authors. Why not contribute?As Noam Chomsky replied to me when I tried to get him to take an interest in Esperanto: “We all have our priorities, otherwise life would not be possible. I’m sorry I cannot satisfy you on this score.”