글: 7
언어: English
Filanator (프로필 보기) 2009년 5월 5일 오전 1:51:03
Vilinilo (프로필 보기) 2009년 5월 5일 오후 1:56:39
In my opinion it meant Esperanto was too beautiful an idea to exist for real... kind of pessimistic, but we can take that as a compliment
Rogir (프로필 보기) 2009년 5월 5일 오후 2:21:16
ceigered (프로필 보기) 2009년 5월 5일 오후 4:51:03
Something that's not dead, and due to extensive documentation as with most things in this day and age probably won't die at all anyway: Esperanto
Although I'd be quite interested in whatever proceeded the original indo-european language.
jan aleksan (프로필 보기) 2009년 5월 5일 오후 5:11:46
ceigered:Here it is: Dnghu.
Although I'd be quite interested in whatever proceeded the original indo-european language.
I think you can find a pdf somewhere about the history of the indo-european languages and the grammar of this language (MIE: modern indo-european).
It's interesting, and seems to be a serious work carried out. But this language seems hard to learn...
ceigered (프로필 보기) 2009년 5월 6일 오전 1:24:58
jan aleksan:Actually Dnghú is the Modern Indo European language, with Dnghú being the word for "Tongue" or "Language" (at least to my understanding) and MIE is like to Proto-Indo-European as Modern Hebrew is to Biblical Hebrew - What I meant was the the proto-language before PIE, e.g. "Proto-World" or some Proto-language which can successfully and legitimately link, say, Proto-Indo European with Proto-Uralic. Unfortunately they're having trouble as is with Indo European and Uralic so I doubt I'll be seeing the 'original' world language any time soon...ceigered:Here it is: Dnghu.
Although I'd be quite interested in whatever proceeded the original indo-european language.
I think you can find a pdf somewhere about the history of the indo-european languages and the grammar of this language (MIE: modern indo-european).
It's interesting, and seems to be a serious work carried out. But this language seems hard to learn...
But thanks Jan for the link anyway