A cautionary tale
od richardhall, 17 czerwca 2009
Wpisy: 6
Język: English
richardhall (Pokaż profil) 17 czerwca 2009, 15:09:30
You see, I didn't notice that my wireless had dropped out when I submitted the 'paper'. Not to worry, I think. I restored the wireless, got the exam up again and then -- here's my downfall -- cleverly restored my answers with Firefox's natty Lazarus plug in. Brilliant!
But I really should have checked that the questions on the 2nd paper were the same as those on the first. Result: spectacular failure. I'm telling myself that I gave the right answers to the wrong questions. It's a sort of comfort.
Thanks for letting me get that off my chest. I feel better now.
Miland (Pokaż profil) 17 czerwca 2009, 15:21:37
richardhall (Pokaż profil) 17 czerwca 2009, 15:45:35
ceigered (Pokaż profil) 18 czerwca 2009, 17:05:06
I've failed the first exam twice ages ago because I didn't take my time and rushed it without study, I never went back to it though so maybe that's what I should do.
erinja (Pokaż profil) 19 czerwca 2009, 00:37:03
Incidentally, this is why, if you ever e-mail ekzamenoj@lernu.net with a question comment on the exams, you should include the actual content of the exam question. Simply saying "Why was -eg- the answer on number four?" isn't enough to tell us which question you had difficulties with, since we have no way of knowing what your number four was.
richardhall (Pokaż profil) 19 czerwca 2009, 12:07:31