글: 36
언어: English
russ (프로필 보기) 2011년 9월 1일 오전 6:12:01
AlexN:APL WAS an influential language back when far fewer programming languages existed and it was a pioneering idea, but its days of prominence have long since passed. (As the wikipedia article says, "Interest in APL has steadily declined since the mid 1980s.") Its dependence on unusual unfamiliar non-ASCII characters as basic elements of syntax is surely one reason it's not widely popular. But indeed its symbols are certainly more easily distinguishable and learnable than Chinese ideograms (for those who already don't know them).Sometimes the language matters:Take a look at this page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/APL_%28programming_...
Do you see any difference ? BTW, APL is one of the most influential programming languages.
(And both character sets present keyboard/typing and display/printing challenges on many computers.)
qwertz (프로필 보기) 2011년 10월 3일 오후 1:12:31
Jev is some kind of chief programming organizer of lernu.net and edukado.net webpage.
Neodivert (프로필 보기) 2012년 7월 19일 오후 12:06:39
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b3f3/6b3f317c0c0379a42ed6a16dcea6d07671d4093c" alt="lango.gif"
The idea of creating a interpreted EO-language came to my mind too and i found this post. I dont know if i'll try it or not.
BTW why the idea of a "esperanta programlingvo" was posted in an English forum?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b3f3/6b3f317c0c0379a42ed6a16dcea6d07671d4093c" alt="lango.gif"
Bemused (프로필 보기) 2012년 8월 1일 오전 7:11:10
AlexN (프로필 보기) 2012년 8월 1일 오전 10:39:20
Neodivert:Maybe im crazy, but i suppose the project is dead, isn't it?Look like it is dead.
Neodivert:BTW why the idea of a "esperanta programlingvo" was posted in an English forum?Because other languages (with known exceptions) were derived from Engish.
What I think:
1. Collections. It is possible to use -j or -ar- suffixes for classes. Example:
klaso Uzanto estas
... //
var u: Uzanto;
uu: Uzantoj;
...
uu.aldoni(u); // ?aldonu?
2. Reflection. Thanks to the regular grammar of Esperanto it is possible to create a complete self-documenting system of classes and member names.
3. Adjectives (a-vortoj). Everything ending with -a could be a part of the namespace of adjectives. Instead of writing
enum COLOR {red, green, yellow};
it is possible to use just ruĝa, verda, flava without any declaration (is it really good idea?)
tositaka (프로필 보기) 2012년 8월 1일 오후 1:56:31