Mesaĝoj: 51
Lingvo: English
ionesc0 (Montri la profilon) 2010-decembro-15 04:52:33
I know, let's just merge all of our affricates and fricatives. We can merge cx with sx (because, after all, what's cx but t + sx ?) And we can merge c and s (for the same reason.)
Maybe we can merge our voiced and non-voiced consonants, so that s and z can be the same, and gx and cx can be the same... eventually, if we keep it up, we'll just have one letter to write over and over again.
1 letter = 1 phoneme is a lovely system. No one worries about the difference between allophones at the conscious level in any language, so why should Esperantists? Just because I can pronounce a velar N, a palatal N, and an alveolar/dental N doesn't mean that I'd know what they even were if I hadn't taken an Elementary Linguistics class, just like most speakers of any language where they aren't separate phonemes.
Sorry for feeding the troll... it just looked so hungry.
Maybe we can merge our voiced and non-voiced consonants, so that s and z can be the same, and gx and cx can be the same... eventually, if we keep it up, we'll just have one letter to write over and over again.
1 letter = 1 phoneme is a lovely system. No one worries about the difference between allophones at the conscious level in any language, so why should Esperantists? Just because I can pronounce a velar N, a palatal N, and an alveolar/dental N doesn't mean that I'd know what they even were if I hadn't taken an Elementary Linguistics class, just like most speakers of any language where they aren't separate phonemes.
Sorry for feeding the troll... it just looked so hungry.