Meldinger: 28
Språk: English
kinghajj (Å vise profilen) 2007 10 23 23:18:14
Li estas inteligenta.
Li inteligentas.
For sentences like that, dropping "esti" could ease conversations, at least for intermediate speakers of Esperanto. What are your thoughts on it?
RiotNrrd (Å vise profilen) 2007 10 24 01:08:30
kinghajj:How acceptable is it to turn an adjective into a verb?It is perfectly acceptable, and is done all the time.
quickstopme (Å vise profilen) 2007 10 25 05:15:00
kinghajj:How acceptable is it to turn an adjective into a verb? For example:Hmm how would that translate if that is a verb?
Li estas inteligenta.
Li inteligentas.
For sentences like that, dropping "esti" could ease conversations, at least for intermediate speakers of Esperanto. What are your thoughts on it?
(sorry, I'm a begninner)
lagwagon555 (Å vise profilen) 2007 10 25 09:02:04
Mi ĝojas = I am happy
So hes asking if
Li inteligentas = He is intelligent
I am also interested to find the answer to the original question. I dont know where to draw the line either.
awake (Å vise profilen) 2007 10 26 01:10:33
You can ad the verb indicators -as, is, os, us, u, and i, to any root word where it makes sense
Consider Li kuras = he runs, or he is running.
Li koleriĝas = He is becoming angry
Li inteligentas = He is intelligent
You could also say things like
Inteligentu! ne fumu! = Be Smart! Don't smoke!
lagwagon555:Apparently in esperanto, you can use verbs for some of the things english uses 'am (adjective)'.
Mi ĝojas = I am happy
So hes asking if
Li inteligentas = He is intelligent
I am also interested to find the answer to the original question. I dont know where to draw the line either.
RiotNrrd (Å vise profilen) 2007 10 26 06:10:21
It's true!
Ĝi estas vera!
Ĝi veras!
Veras!
BasCostBudde (Å vise profilen) 2007 10 26 08:47:02
Ĝi veras! => (the thing you just said) is true
Veras! => "there is truth", possibly followed by an explicative clause
"It rains" is the common example of an artificial subject, hence translates into "pluvas".
mnlg (Å vise profilen) 2007 10 26 09:45:23
BasCostBudde:Ĝi veras! => (the thing you just said) is true"tio veras" is perhaps much better for this meaning.
I would use "ĝi veras" to mean more or less "it really exists", but on second thought perhaps I wouldn't.
Veras! => "there is truth", possibly followed by an explicative clauseWell, keep in mind that when you say something like "veras, ke lia nomo estas Jozefo" (it is true that his name is Joseph), the subject is "ke lia nomo estas Jozefo" (subjective sub-sentence introced by "ke"), so there is a subject after all.
RiotNrrd (Å vise profilen) 2007 10 26 15:11:32
BasCostBudde:"It rains" is the common example of an artificial subject, hence translates into "pluvas".It seems to me that one could make the case that in the sentence "It is raining", "it" could be considered to refer to a real subject because "it" refers (or could refer) to that big cloud overhead.
"The big cloud right up above us is raining."
"It is raining."
So, I think there might be a bit of a grey area here.
mnlg (Å vise profilen) 2007 10 26 15:51:22
RiotNrrd:So, I think there might be a bit of a grey area here.All that's grey is the raining sky
No, I think that "pluvas" is the Esperanto version of (neo)latin impersonal verbs. You can say, for instance, "ventas kaj pluvas", or "sunas ekstere", and, as far as I know, that would be perfectly accepted.
If you really want an explanation, though, just think of "pluvas" as "estas pluvo", that is literally, "there is rain", just as in "estas libro sur la tablo", there's a book on the table.