پستها: 14
زبان: English
Leke (نمایش مشخصات) 15 ژوئن 2013، 19:04:34
Mi iru por kuri.
Is this correct? Also, how about...
Mi devus iri por kuri.
Would that be understood?
goli (نمایش مشخصات) 15 ژوئن 2013، 21:55:14
P. S. A thought just has got into my mind. On an Esperanto site, we use English to find understanding between each other. 'Cause I'm Russian, Leke is Finnish, English isn't a mother tounge for both of us. It's kinda funny.
kefga_x (نمایش مشخصات) 15 ژوئن 2013، 23:20:07
goli:P. S. A thought just has got into my mind. On an Esperanto site, we use English to find understanding between each other. 'Cause I'm Russian, Leke is Finnish, English isn't a mother tounge for both of us. It's kinda funny.I think that happens fairly regularly here and everywhere else on the internet.
![lango.gif](/images/smileys/lango.gif)
Leke (نمایش مشخصات) 15 ژوئن 2013، 23:32:35
goli:P. S. A thought just has got into my mind. On an Esperanto site, we use English to find understanding between each other. 'Cause I'm Russian, Leke is Finnish, English isn't a mother tounge for both of us. It's kinda funny.You make a good point, but I'm actually an English guy living in Finland. Still, it's common for many other people.
Epovikipedio (نمایش مشخصات) 16 ژوئن 2013، 0:07:40
kefga_x:I would think something simpler like, Mi devus kuradi, would work nicely too and lets you be a little lazier at only 3 words!This or Mi kur(ad)u.
Oijos (نمایش مشخصات) 16 ژوئن 2013، 0:26:19
sudanglo (نمایش مشخصات) 16 ژوئن 2013، 10:12:29
I suspect you misuse conditional(-us). It should be used only to indicate conditionalityNo!
Ĉu vi povus pasigi (transdoni) la sukeron.
Devus as 'should' (a weak form of must) is perfectly ordinary in Esperanto. The problem here is not translating the 'should' but how to express the idea of going for a run, distinguishing it from running.
Kuradi doesn't solve the problem, I think. A 'run' here is an ekzerco-kuro or trejniĝa kuro.
Perhaps you could say mi devus iri por troto, or mi devus kurigi min.
The common English expression 'go for a ..' could receive various translations in Esperanto depending on what follows the 'a',
kefga_x (نمایش مشخصات) 16 ژوئن 2013، 10:58:42
sudanglo:Devus as 'should' (a weak form of must) is perfectly ordinary in Esperanto. The problem here is not translating the 'should' but how to express the idea of going for a run, distinguishing it from running.What is the difference between these two:
I'm going running.
I'm going for a run.
To me they seem to be exactly the same. Although I'll be thinking about this now trying to figure out the practical difference. Good question sudanglo!
Roberto12 (نمایش مشخصات) 16 ژوئن 2013، 14:36:55
(I once had the idea of using "devu" for the optative, and another possibility is "deveti".)
Oijos (نمایش مشخصات) 16 ژوئن 2013، 21:41:51
sudanglo:I have a direct command to the contrary from the Esperanto course in the Internet created by Marko Rauhamaa. He says that it is ordinary, but plainly wrong. LinkI suspect you misuse conditional(-us). It should be used only to indicate conditionalityNo!
Ĉu vi povus pasigi (transdoni) la sukeron.
Devus as 'should' (a weak form of must) is perfectly ordinary in Esperanto.