Ujumbe: 23
Lugha: English
Alkanadi (Wasifu wa mtumiaji) 20 Oktoba 2015 4:23:36 alasiri
For example: heroo
1 - he-ro
2 - he-ro-o
I have heard both before.
Hound_of_God (Wasifu wa mtumiaji) 20 Oktoba 2015 4:36:11 alasiri
If one sound had been intended, there would be one o, I believe.
erinja (Wasifu wa mtumiaji) 20 Oktoba 2015 6:13:54 alasiri
romaĝiKvadhaŝ:Continuing off this, there's some debate over if it should be "Hero" or "Heroo", "Video" or "Videoo"I have never heard of this debate.
"Heroo" is pronounced with the o held longer but it's not like saying "oh oh", totally separate. And the emphasis is obviously on the -ro-.
Kirilo81 (Wasifu wa mtumiaji) 20 Oktoba 2015 6:38:24 alasiri
erinja:"Heroo" is pronounced with the o held longer but it's not like saying "oh oh", totally separate.Really, so [hɛ'rᴐ:]? This sounds strange to me - I say and hear [hɛ'rᴐᴐ] - and a direct violation of §9 of the Fundamenta Gramatiko:
Every word is to be read exactly as written, there are no silent letters.
Kirilo81 (Wasifu wa mtumiaji) 20 Oktoba 2015 7:52:40 alasiri
erinja (Wasifu wa mtumiaji) 20 Oktoba 2015 8:08:23 alasiri
Kirilo81:You are pronouncing it, by virtue of holding the o longer. It's just like how we hold the n longer in "finnlando" than we would in "finlando". It's not fin-n-lando. Similarly if we say "striko" we say str, we don't say suh-tuh-riko. Letters are pronounced but they do blend together and that's fine, each letter certainly does not have to be separated by some kind of pause in between to extra sure that everyone hears the break between them.erinja:"Heroo" is pronounced with the o held longer but it's not like saying "oh oh", totally separate.Really, so [hɛ'rᴐ:]? This sounds strange to me - I say and hear [hɛ'rᴐᴐ] - and a direct violation of §9 of the Fundamenta Gramatiko:Every word is to be read exactly as written, there are no silent letters.
Kirilo81 (Wasifu wa mtumiaji) 20 Oktoba 2015 8:54:06 alasiri
In my opinion the following three examples do it right: Forvo: herooj. There is a difference between the two os, at least in tone.
erinja (Wasifu wa mtumiaji) 20 Oktoba 2015 9:37:22 alasiri
Kirilo81:Of course with nn there is no way than pronounce it as [n:], but with vowels and stops there is an audible difference between double and long pronounciation - with no need to add extreme pauses (or a glottal stop as some Germans would do it: [hɛ'rᴐɁᴐ]).Tone, yes. But that's it. It's hardly and "oh oh" with a break in between. No need to add some crazy glottal stop, which I think some people think you need to do (I hear some Esperantists doing it so I know it happens)
In my opinion the following three examples do it right: Forvo: herooj. There is a difference between the two os, at least in tone.
Fenris_kcf (Wasifu wa mtumiaji) 20 Oktoba 2015 9:41:05 alasiri
erinja (Wasifu wa mtumiaji) 20 Oktoba 2015 9:48:27 alasiri
Fenris_kcf:I also highly disagree, that an Esperanto "oo" is spoken as a long "o". And the word "Finnlando" is a an abomination from lower hell. I really prefer using "Suomio" instead.Your opinion of the word "Finnlando" doesn't really matter, the point of this discussion is a double consonant. I could easily have used "tuttaga" as the example.