글: 24
언어: English
gianich73 (프로필 보기) 2016년 9월 1일 오후 6:17:20
Prepositions are always difficult for me in any language. I just saw in www.transparent.com that they are presenting the sentence: "Ŝi estas alergia al fragoj" and I wonder whether this is a literal translation from English "She is allergic to strawberries". Shouldn't it be "Ŝi estas alergia je fragoj"? Thank you/dankon. I have not seen the new website.
Gian
opalo (프로필 보기) 2016년 9월 1일 오후 10:05:03
In fact (imo) you could just say Ŝi alergias fragojn.
To have an allergic reaction: reagi (alergie) kontraŭ/al/pro k.t.p.
Vestitor (프로필 보기) 2016년 9월 1일 오후 10:55:21
I'd much rather that prepositions were fixed.
gianich73 (프로필 보기) 2016년 9월 2일 오후 12:50:11
Dankon.
bartlett22183 (프로필 보기) 2016년 9월 2일 오후 6:21:15
opalo (프로필 보기) 2016년 9월 2일 오후 11:49:42
The general rule is: use the preposition which feels most logical. If you're hesitating, use je.
bartlett22183 (프로필 보기) 2016년 9월 3일 오후 6:14:37
opalo:But how often does different from/to/than actually cause a misunderstanding?Certainly for educated native speakers of varying dialects of English, different from/to/than does not cause any problem. It is only that an unfamiliar usage might seem very slightly odd, but there is no misunderstanding. I speculate that something might be similar among native speakers of different dialects of relatively widespread languages such as French.
The general rule is: use the preposition which feels most logical. If you're hesitating, use je.
However, when it comes to an international language such as Esperanto, learned and used by persons of highly dissimilar native tongues, prepositions (and some native languages do not even have prepositions) among their native habits vary so widely that in my estimation there is a genuine risk of misunderstanding if the meanings and specified uses are not set forth well. And as another respondent has remarked, je should only be used as a last resort.
gianich73 (프로필 보기) 2016년 9월 3일 오후 7:24:16
bartlett22183:Even within one larger language community prepositions can be a nightmare. For example, among English speakers in various parts of the world, some say "different to," some say "different from," and some say "different than." Yes, I agree that for an international language such as Esperanto, use of prepositions should be fixed insofar as reasonably possible in order to help avoid misunderstanding.Misunderstanding and misuse.
Dankon
gianich73 (프로필 보기) 2016년 9월 3일 오후 7:28:19
Roch:"Je" is suppose to be used in last resort... when no other can be used, here it's the contrary, too many could be...But "al" is not correct, because al implies direction of movement. Allergies do not go in any direction. I am confused.
Then if someone should pick one, let say to avoid disregard. I'd pick al, alergias al fragoj. Just to avoid je.
gianich73 (프로필 보기) 2016년 9월 3일 오후 7:30:22
bartlett22183:opalo:But how often does different from/to/than actually cause a misunderstanding?Certainly for educated native speakers of varying dialects of English, different from/to/than does not cause any problem. It is only that an unfamiliar usage might seem very slightly odd, but there is no misunderstanding. I speculate that something might be similar among native speakers of different dialects of relatively widespread languages such as French.
The general rule is: use the preposition which feels most logical. If you're hesitating, use je.
Yes, in Spanish is like that. It sounds funny to me when other Spanish speakers choose a different word or preposition to what I am used, but I still understand in the majority of the cases. In some cases, I may misunderstand.