Съобщения: 88
Език: English
Rogir (Покажи профила) 23 септември 2009, 23:28:30
jchthys:Are not babies and children people?No, what made you think that?
outs (Покажи профила) 24 септември 2009, 07:49:40
Oŝo-Jabe:Well, "ĝi" is used for human children and animals. However "li" is the typical pronoun used when someone's sex is unknown.That's not very logical because humains are animals (species H. s. sapiens,Order: Primates,Class: Mammalia)
![okulumo.gif](/images/smileys/okulumo.gif)
Rogir:Definitely in French they are ... (and probably the same for Spanish an Italian) That's why I found quite illogical also to use a different pronoun (in esperanto) for a baby/child or an adult.jchthys:Are not babies and children people?No, what made you think that?
ceigered (Покажи профила) 24 септември 2009, 09:58:28
outs:That's not very logical because humains are animals (species H. s. sapiens,Order: Primates,Class: Mammalia)To further elaborateI never really understood why peoples have a so big problem with that...
![rido.gif](/images/smileys/rido.gif)
Domain: Eukarya (Includes Animals, Plants, Fungi etc)
Kingdom: Animalia (Animals)
Phylum: Chordata (vertebrates and even some invertebrates)
Superclass: Tetrapoda (all those things with 4 limbs)
Class: Mammilia (anything that makes milk)
Infraclass: Eutheria (anything with a placenta)
Superorder: Euarchontoglires (rats, mice, bunny rabbits, tree shrews)
Order: Primates (monkeys, lemurs, baboons)
Suborder: Haplorrhini (dry nose primates)
Infraorder: Simiiformes (monkeys, apes etc)
Parvorder: Catarrhini (old world monkeys and apes)
Superfamily: Hominoidea (gibbons, orangutans apes etc)
Family: Hominidae (hominoidea missing a few letters and a few gibbons)
Subfamily: Homininae (hominidae said a bit more nasaly)
Tribe: Hominini (Chimps)
Genus: Homo (finally humans)
Mmm, I agree with outs, considering it's a bit of a waste to have a pronoun that can only be used for one genus of animal
![lango.gif](/images/smileys/lango.gif)
jchthys (Покажи профила) 24 септември 2009, 14:25:11
ceigered:Because only we humans speak Esperantoouts:That's not very logical because humains are animals (species H. s. sapiens,Order: Primates,Class: Mammalia)Mmm, I agree with outs, considering it's a bit of a waste to have a pronoun that can only be used for one genus of animalI never really understood why peoples have a so big problem with that...
![rideto.gif](/images/smileys/rideto.gif)
ceigered (Покажи профила) 24 септември 2009, 15:48:43
jchthys:Well at the moment at least
Because only we humans speak Esperanto
![rido.gif](/images/smileys/rido.gif)
Then again is there such thing as Sign-Esperanto anyway (e.g. 1 word = 1 sign, not just a sign-alphabet)?
Ailanto (Покажи профила) 24 септември 2009, 15:58:42
Zafur:There's already things in Esperanto that people seem to like to call sexist.Yeah! A special honorific suffix for women but nothing for men... we're just tossed in with all the unimportant nonfeminine stuff in the universe!If the intended usage is generic with an unstated gender, I see no reason to use a pronoun that has any implied gender(s).
![okulumo.gif](/images/smileys/okulumo.gif)
(I'm also a fan of saying "sex" when we mean "sex". Gender is not sex, though it is sometimes related to sex.)
Miland (Покажи профила) 24 септември 2009, 19:40:51
ceigered:'tiam ĉi ridbrakumeti'What does that mean? 'Then this smiling-handshaking'?
![demando.gif](/images/smileys/demando.gif)
I think I understand a little better now the expression 'that sounds Chinese'!
Zafur (Покажи профила) 24 септември 2009, 20:34:39
Ailanto:Inorite?Zafur:There's already things in Esperanto that people seem to like to call sexist.Yeah! A special honorific suffix for women but nothing for men... we're just tossed in with all the unimportant nonfeminine stuff in the universe!If the intended usage is generic with an unstated gender, I see no reason to use a pronoun that has any implied gender(s).
![]()
(I'm also a fan of saying "sex" when we mean "sex". Gender is not sex, though it is sometimes related to sex.)
And males get a prefix but females don't... Hm.
(I know that gender isn't sex.
Perhaps more correct to my intentions was "with unstated sex(es) or gender(s) (or lack thereof)" and "that has any implied sex(es)or gender(s) (or lack thereof)"
Completely open to all scenarios.
I just tend to use gender as shorthand for issues like these because to have a gender, generally one has to have a sex... Until we get AI working better, at least.
![lango.gif](/images/smileys/lango.gif)
Edit: Or would oni fit that definition anyways?