글: 59
언어: English
Leke (프로필 보기) 2012년 3월 24일 오후 9:50:37
Pomoj estas bonaj.
Pomoj gustas bonoj.
If this isn't correct and they both should be adjectives, can you give some examples of "bono"?
Thanks.
Chainy (프로필 보기) 2012년 3월 24일 오후 10:49:04
Leke:Pomoj gustas bonoj.
![demando.gif](/images/smileys/demando.gif)
Take a look in ReVo for some examples of 'bono'.
Leke (프로필 보기) 2012년 3월 25일 오전 4:42:54
sudanglo (프로필 보기) 2012년 3월 25일 오전 10:15:16
There is an interesting discussion in PAG of the distinction between Mi sentas min bone (Mi bonfartas - I'm feeling fine/doing OK) and Mi sentas min bona (I'm alright).
RiotNrrd (프로필 보기) 2012년 3월 25일 오후 6:54:11
Which seems a slightly different sentiment.
Anyway, I don't really want to derail this thread (because we never do that here). But I'd be interested in seeing the PAG discussion. How can I find it?
kaffirlily (프로필 보기) 2012년 3월 25일 오후 11:11:33
sudanglo:Pomoj gustas bonoj/bonaj/bone Perhaps the best way to express the idea is Pomoj bongustasThis is probably a silly question, but what exactly is "PAG"? I have seen several references to it in the forums, and have no idea what is meant by it.
There is an interesting discussion in PAG of the distinction between Mi sentas min bone (Mi bonfartas - I'm feeling fine/doing OK) and Mi sentas min bona (I'm alright).
erinja (프로필 보기) 2012년 3월 26일 오전 12:04:29
The other well-known book of Esperanto grammar is the much more recent book PMEG, the Plena Manlibro de Esperanta Gramatiko (Complete Handbook of Esperanto Grammar)
PAG tends to use traditional grammatical terminology, which can be confusing for people who are unfamiliar with these terms (but helpful to those who perhaps learned grammar of other languages using that terminology). PMEG uses less technical grammatical terminology, which is more descriptive. As far as the grammar itself, PAG and PMEG occasionally disagree on which would be the preferred form, but both are considered quite reliable and well-respected.
kaffirlily (프로필 보기) 2012년 3월 26일 오전 2:31:20
erinja:PAG is Plena Analiza Gramatiko, a well-known book of Esperanto grammar. It is out of print now but there are still copies around, used.Ah, thanks! I will keep an eye out for them.
The other well-known book of Esperanto grammar is the much more recent book PMEG, the Plena Manlibro de Esperanta Gramatiko (Complete Handbook of Esperanto Grammar)
PAG tends to use traditional grammatical terminology, which can be confusing for people who are unfamiliar with these terms (but helpful to those who perhaps learned grammar of other languages using that terminology). PMEG uses less technical grammatical terminology, which is more descriptive. As far as the grammar itself, PAG and PMEG occasionally disagree on which would be the preferred form, but both are considered quite reliable and well-respected.
darkweasel (프로필 보기) 2012년 3월 26일 오전 5:39:41
erinja:It is out of print now but there are still copies around, used.There’s even an online copy that was linked to somewhere on these forums.
sudanglo (프로필 보기) 2012년 3월 26일 오전 10:19:20
I don't think we need to be literal about it. It is rather using the resources of the language to make a distinction.
Think about how we may give, or enquire about, approval. Tre bone - excellent, well done. Ĉu bone, nun? Is it OK now. Using the adjective form, would shift the emphasis, from a more general evaluation, to something more specific.
Pomoj gustas bone. Ĉu bonaj, la pomoj?