メッセージ: 16
言語: English
Tsahraf (プロフィールを表示) 2016年2月17日 11:15:16
I said, "he shakes his head." = "Li lavas lian kapon."
Very bad mistake, I meant to say:
"he shakes his head." = "Li skuas lian kapon."
I doubt there is any culture where one washes someone's head to indicate "no."
I agree it should be "sian" instead of "lian." That is how I see Zamenhof using "sian" in La Sankta Biblia. For example:
"nun eble li etendos sian manon..."
sergejm (プロフィールを表示) 2016年2月18日 5:27:44
But in
'Kliento venis al frizejo kaj petis, ke frizisto frizu lian barbon'
this means client's beard, 'sian barbon' would mean barber's beard.
nornen (プロフィールを表示) 2016年2月18日 15:21:42
sergejm:'Li skuas lian kapon' is understandable if there is no other 'li'.I dare to disagree. "Li skuas lian kapon" without doubt implies that there are indeed two different persons involved: The shaker and the owner of the head. It is impossible that this sentence refers to only one person.
erinja (プロフィールを表示) 2016年2月18日 16:12:30
nornen:Right.sergejm:'Li skuas lian kapon' is understandable if there is no other 'li'.I dare to disagree. "Li skuas lian kapon" without doubt implies that there are indeed two different persons involved: The shaker and the owner of the head. It is impossible that this sentence refers to only one person.
Even if you understood through context that the person means to say "Li skuas sian kapon", by definition the sentence has to refer to another "li", so if there is clearly only one "li" in the picture, then you assume the person speaking made a grammatical error.
Miland (プロフィールを表示) 2016年2月19日 8:42:46
Kirilo81 (プロフィールを表示) 2016年2月19日 8:50:35