Tin nhắn: 20
Nội dung: English
jonsd (Xem thông tin cá nhân) 10:37:03 Ngày 10 tháng 3 năm 2007
The original rule was to add "o" to each consonant letter, i.e.
a, bo, co, cxo, do, e, fo, go, gxo, ho,
But I've been told that this is incorrect.
I have read that this has been replaced by a scheme which better distinguishes letters.
I have seen:
a, ba, co, cxo, da, e, fo, ga, gxa, ha,
etc. (in J.C.Wells dictionary)
and:
a, be, ce, cxa, de, e, ef, ge, gxe, ha,
hxi, i, je, ka, el, om, en, o, pa,
etc, at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esperanto_orthography
Which scheme should I use for a text-to-speech synthesizer: http://espeak.sf.net/ ?
Kwekubo (Xem thông tin cá nhân) 14:14:10 Ngày 10 tháng 3 năm 2007
erinja (Xem thông tin cá nhân) 15:28:37 Ngày 10 tháng 3 năm 2007
jonsd:Kwekubo is right; I never heard anything but the -o system.
I have seen:
a, ba, co, ĉo, da, e, fo, ga, ĝa, ha,
etc. (in J.C.Wells dictionary)
and:
a, be, ce, ĉa, de, e, ef, ge, ĝe, ha,
ĥi, i, je, ka, el, om, en, o, pa,
etc, at
And actually, these other systems don't look much better to me. They both have b- and d- followed by the same vowel. Since b and d are hard to distinguish in poor sound conditions, I am really surprised that the people who devised those methods didn't find a better way to distinguish them than be/de and ba/da.
Islander (Xem thông tin cá nhân) 14:41:13 Ngày 12 tháng 3 năm 2007
I am really surprised that the people who devised those methods didn't find a better way to distinguish them than be/de and ba/da.They did, it's called the phonectic alphabet: Alpha, Bravo, Charlie, ... (this is obviously using a conventional western alphabet). I suppose we can make a contest out of making a new Esperanto based phonetic alphabet!
Kwekubo (Xem thông tin cá nhân) 11:51:06 Ngày 13 tháng 3 năm 2007
Islander:They did, it's called the phonectic alphabet: Alpha, Bravo, Charlie, ... (this is obviously using a conventional western alphabet). I suppose we can make a contest out of making a new Esperanto based phonetic alphabet!There already is at least one version - I remember coming across it in Gaston Waringhien's "Lingvo kaj Vivo". I don't have the book to hand unfortunately so I can't give some examples.
T0dd (Xem thông tin cá nhân) 01:51:38 Ngày 14 tháng 3 năm 2007
kanajlo (Xem thông tin cá nhân) 01:44:14 Ngày 18 tháng 3 năm 2007
"Asfalto, Barbaro, Centimetro, Ĉefo, Doktoro, Elemento, Fabriko, Gumo, Ĝirafo, Hotelo, Ĥaoso, Insekto, Jubileo, Ĵurnalo, Kilogramo, Legendo, Maŝino, Naturo, Oktobro, Papero, Rekordo, Salato, Ŝilingo, Triumfo, Universo, Ŭ Universo-hoko, Vulkano, Zinko."
Ankau mi notis en 1992-a Jarlibro la jenon:
alfa, bravo, cigaredo, ĉefo, delta, eĥo, floro, golfo, ĝojo, hotelo, ĥaoso, indiano, Juliet', ĵuro, kilo, luno, maŝino, novembro, oktobro, papo, kuo, rekordo, sofo, ŝafo (aŭ ŝilingo), triumfo, uniformo, uniform-hoko, Viktorio, vavo (w), ikso (x), ipsolono (y), zuluo.
Kwekubo (Xem thông tin cá nhân) 18:13:49 Ngày 18 tháng 3 năm 2007
Anna, Bastiano, Cezaro, Ĉefeĉ, Davido, Eduardo, Frederiko, Gastono, Ĝakomo, Hamleto, Ĥoreb, Izaako, Jozefo, Ĵaval, Kolumbo, Ludoviko, Moseo, Natalia, Oktavo, Petro, Quirinal, Rajmondo, Sofia, Ŝimŝon, Tomaso, Ursula, Ŭestlando, Valentina, William, Xerxes, Yelland, Zamenhof.
Islander (Xem thông tin cá nhân) 21:17:31 Ngày 19 tháng 3 năm 2007
Also, each word should be selected by its unlikelyness to be used in a normal conversation to avoid confusion, and by it clear reference to the letter each word represent.
I spend my day on the phone, so I'm very familiar with the NATO standard. But there are days when I just feel like having fun with this: [LISTO]
Yes, it's K like knife and P like psychologist... [/list]
kanajlo (Xem thông tin cá nhân) 01:24:36 Ngày 20 tháng 3 năm 2007
My first Esperanto teacher once said it was important to learn to spell well in Esperanto, because directions may be given to you over the phone, street names and family names and such, or vice versa. A good phonetic alphabet would be instantly and easily understood by any fluent Esperanto speaker, even if that speaker had never encountered it before. Don't you agree?