Sisu juurde
Vasta

Accusative with Participles

kelle poolt jollyjamaes, 28. juuni 2012

Postitused: 4

Keel: English

jollyjamaes (Näita profiili) 28. juuni 2012 7:16.37

I am wondering if the accusative is used after participles. For example, in the phrase "the man eating chocolate", would the translation be "la viro manĝanta ĉokolado" or "la viro manĝanta ĉokoladon" (or something else)? Another example: would "a man named Marko" be "viro nomita Marko" or "viro nomita Markon" (or something else)? Thanks!

sudanglo (Näita profiili) 28. juuni 2012 9:54.19

If you didn't mark the object after an active transitive participle eg leono manĝanta tigro, you couldn't tell (in theory) if it was a lion eating a tiger, or a tiger eating a lion, though the supposition would be that if was the lion doing the eating. That answers your first point.

However, often, X Y-ing Z would be translated as X kiu Y-as Z.

La viro nomita Marko is correct. Oni nomis lin Marko.

In Esperanto there is a distinction between nomita Marko and nomata Marko. However, since usually a person once given a name retains it, the two forms may amount to the same thing.

oxymor (Näita profiili) 28. juuni 2012 14:17.09

I think it's better with an adverb "La viro manĝante ĉokoladon", am I right?

Hyperboreus (Näita profiili) 28. juuni 2012 17:38.22

Forigite

Tagasi üles