Ujumbe: 17
Lugha: English
exaos (Wasifu wa mtumiaji) 20 Desemba 2012 7:44:31 asubuhi
Fenris_kcf (Wasifu wa mtumiaji) 20 Desemba 2012 8:30:08 asubuhi
I would understand any Esperanto-sentence without a subject in the way, that i am the actor, so "vin amas" is totally clear to me.
BTW: I don't understand how this question fits in the English forum.
MoutOp (Wasifu wa mtumiaji) 20 Desemba 2012 8:37:06 asubuhi
Chainy (Wasifu wa mtumiaji) 20 Desemba 2012 8:37:07 asubuhi
Fenris_kcf:...so "vin amas" is totally clear to me.It's very confusing to me. I'm wondering who or what 'amas'!
hebda999 (Wasifu wa mtumiaji) 20 Desemba 2012 10:05:36 asubuhi
Chainy:Sometimes I must agree with Chainy. It is bad Esperanto.Fenris_kcf:...so "vin amas" is totally clear to me.It's very confusing to me. I'm wondering who or what 'amas'!
tommjames (Wasifu wa mtumiaji) 20 Desemba 2012 10:39:59 asubuhi
Fenris_kcf:I would understand any Esperanto-sentence without a subject in the way, that i am the actorAre you sure? What about "Temas pri gramatiko" or "Baldaŭ pluvos" or "Estas bone"?
Anyway as to the question, "Vin amas" is bad Esperanto. There are only a very small number of sensubjektaj verbs in Esperanto and I wouldn't count "ami" among them.
myris (Wasifu wa mtumiaji) 20 Desemba 2012 11:09:16 asubuhi
älsk-ar.
Roberto12 (Wasifu wa mtumiaji) 20 Desemba 2012 11:21:35 asubuhi
Mi estas = estam
Vi estas = estas
Ĝi estas = estat
Ni estas = estajm
Vi estas = estajs
Ili estas = estajt
Only in this hypothetical ancestor language would the phrase in the OP be valid, in which case of course it would be rendered as "vin amam".
myris (Wasifu wa mtumiaji) 20 Desemba 2012 12:12:20 alasiri
älsk-ar.
exaos (Wasifu wa mtumiaji) 20 Desemba 2012 12:38:50 alasiri