Sadržaj
Odgovori

Your hair needs cutting

od sudanglo, 10. listopada 2015.

Poruke: 35

Jezik: English

sudanglo (Prikaz profila) 10. listopada 2015. 09:04:23

Can you translate into Esperanto the following preserving the same subject:

Your hair needs cutting.
The window frames need painting.
This room needs cleaning.

Серёга (Prikaz profila) 10. listopada 2015. 09:53:47

Via hararo bezonas tondadon.
La fenestra framo bezonas farbadon.
Tiu ĉi ĉambro bezonas ordofaradon.

Fenris_kcf (Prikaz profila) 10. listopada 2015. 13:24:19

I'd use either one of the affixes "-ind"/"-end" or the volative "-u" on "est" along with the passive participle, e.g.:

Via hararo estas tondinda/tondenda.
Via hararo estu tondata/tondota.

Tempodivalse (Prikaz profila) 10. listopada 2015. 14:35:52

Why do you want to preserve the same subject?

"X needs to [passive]" is rather idiomatic to English, I would think, and not easily (or appropriately) translated to some other languages.

Rujo (Prikaz profila) 10. listopada 2015. 15:55:50

It seems to me that the verb "postuli" also is good enough to formulate the examples. It is also unnecessary to use the suffix "ad", given in the examples "tondri" and "farbi", applying the principle of necessity (neceso) and sufficiency (sufiĉo) because the first are verbal and the last one is substantive. So, we would give the following examples: Viaj [kap]haroj postulas tondron. La fenestra framo postulas farbon. Tiu ĉi ĉambro postulas ord[ig]on.

RiotNrrd (Prikaz profila) 10. listopada 2015. 16:27:25

Eble...
Via hararo tondindas.
La fenestraj framoj farbindas.
Ktp.

I considered an -iĝ suffix in there, but thought that context is perhaps sufficient to make clear what is what. In some cases like these I am still not real strong on when to use it and when not to. So, perhaps tondiĝindas, etc.

Transitivity still bedevils me, sometimes.

klmn (Prikaz profila) 10. listopada 2015. 16:32:13

Vi bezonas tondri la hararon.
Oni bezonas farbi la ramon de fenestro.
La ĉambro devus esti ordigita.

Серёга (Prikaz profila) 10. listopada 2015. 19:56:44

RiotNrrd:Eble...
Via hararo tondindas.
La fenestraj framoj farbindas.
Ktp.

I considered an -iĝ suffix in there, but thought that context is perhaps sufficient to make clear what is what. In some cases like these I am still not real strong on when to use it and when not to. So, perhaps tondiĝindas, etc.

Transitivity still bedevils me, sometimes.
I like this variant.

robbkvasnak (Prikaz profila) 10. listopada 2015. 21:03:58

In large parts of the US people use the form: you hair needs cut - the room needs painted... etc.
I know "grammarians" will tell me that this is wrong [and it is also not a form that I use] but it is so common that trying to change the speech of so many would be impossible

Vestitor (Prikaz profila) 10. listopada 2015. 21:26:40

robbkvasnak:In large parts of the US people use the form: you hair needs cut - the room needs painted... etc.
I know "grammarians" will tell me that this is wrong [and it is also not a form that I use] but it is so common that trying to change the speech of so many would be impossible
Are you serious? It's not just 'wrong', but semi-literate. The same sort of structure creates: 'Your hair needs wash..' which sounds like someone speaking English as a second language. I could easily understand: 'Your hair needs (a good) wash', but not the former sentence.

Natrag na vrh