Wannabe
من lingvokapablo, 9 مارس، 2012
المشاركات: 17
لغة: English
lingvokapablo (عرض الملف الشخصي) 9 مارس، 2012 4:19:26 ص
carmona (عرض الملف الشخصي) 9 مارس، 2012 4:56:26 ص
lingvokapablo:What would be a good word for "wannabe" in Esperanto?Maybe "estemulo", literaly? Inferentialy, no idea.
lingvokapablo (عرض الملف الشخصي) 9 مارس، 2012 5:52:54 ص
carmona:Maybe "estemulo", literaly?I could be reading it wrong, but I don't think "estemulo" would work. The way I read "estemulo" just doesn't have the negative connotation associated with it like the word "wannabe" has.
Vilius (عرض الملف الشخصي) 9 مارس، 2012 5:58:30 ص
Desmut (عرض الملف الشخصي) 9 مارس، 2012 6:16:36 ص
Vilius:Maybe afektulo, ŝajnigulo. In severe cases of wannabeism even fal(em)suloEble vi celis la vorton fals(em)ulo, cxu ne?
Evildela (عرض الملف الشخصي) 9 مارس، 2012 8:46:49 ص
Vilius (عرض الملف الشخصي) 9 مارس، 2012 11:52:08 ص
Desmut:Eble vi celis la vorton fals(em)ulo, cxu ne?Jes, dankon.
sudanglo (عرض الملف الشخصي) 9 مارس، 2012 12:34:24 م
komenstanto (عرض الملف الشخصي) 10 مارس، 2012 7:08:43 م
I had an argument with a blues musician from northern Germany who suggested that only the Eric Clapton generation were NOT wannabes. All subsequent rock is wannabe. To me though, Clapton was a wannabe blues artist as well, as he copied the African American musicians. I don't see where the line is drawn. To stop change and innovation goes against human evolution.
The concept of wannabe thus has no productive meaning for human progress.
lingvokapablo (عرض الملف الشخصي) 10 مارس، 2012 9:00:53 م
komenstanto:I like 'afektulo', though strictly speaking, I think everyone is a wannabe, or no one. The idea of 'social-learning' means copying other ideas in order to help evolve them. I watched a video that suggested chimpanzees lacked social-learning skills, thus they could not evolve like humans by copying each other and improving. They merely do the same thing over and over.For me, when I use the word "wannabe" it comes down to authenticity. A wannabe to me isn't someone who sincerely wants to learn, they want "it" (whatever it happens to be) because it's cool or socially accepted.
I had an argument with a blues musician from northern Germany who suggested that only the Eric Clapton generation were NOT wannabes. All subsequent rock is wannabe. To me though, Clapton was a wannabe blues artist as well, as he copied the African American musicians. I don't see where the line is drawn. To stop change and innovation goes against human evolution.
The concept of wannabe thus has no productive meaning for human progress.
However, I do agree with you when you say we as humans copy each other to learn.