Ujumbe: 17
Lugha: English
lingvokapablo (Wasifu wa mtumiaji) 9 Machi 2012 4:19:26 asubuhi
carmona (Wasifu wa mtumiaji) 9 Machi 2012 4:56:26 asubuhi
lingvokapablo:What would be a good word for "wannabe" in Esperanto?Maybe "estemulo", literaly? Inferentialy, no idea.
lingvokapablo (Wasifu wa mtumiaji) 9 Machi 2012 5:52:54 asubuhi
carmona:Maybe "estemulo", literaly?I could be reading it wrong, but I don't think "estemulo" would work. The way I read "estemulo" just doesn't have the negative connotation associated with it like the word "wannabe" has.
Vilius (Wasifu wa mtumiaji) 9 Machi 2012 5:58:30 asubuhi
Desmut (Wasifu wa mtumiaji) 9 Machi 2012 6:16:36 asubuhi
Vilius:Maybe afektulo, ŝajnigulo. In severe cases of wannabeism even fal(em)suloEble vi celis la vorton fals(em)ulo, cxu ne?
Evildela (Wasifu wa mtumiaji) 9 Machi 2012 8:46:49 asubuhi
Vilius (Wasifu wa mtumiaji) 9 Machi 2012 11:52:08 asubuhi
Desmut:Eble vi celis la vorton fals(em)ulo, cxu ne?Jes, dankon.
sudanglo (Wasifu wa mtumiaji) 9 Machi 2012 12:34:24 alasiri
komenstanto (Wasifu wa mtumiaji) 10 Machi 2012 7:08:43 alasiri
I had an argument with a blues musician from northern Germany who suggested that only the Eric Clapton generation were NOT wannabes. All subsequent rock is wannabe. To me though, Clapton was a wannabe blues artist as well, as he copied the African American musicians. I don't see where the line is drawn. To stop change and innovation goes against human evolution.
The concept of wannabe thus has no productive meaning for human progress.
lingvokapablo (Wasifu wa mtumiaji) 10 Machi 2012 9:00:53 alasiri
komenstanto:I like 'afektulo', though strictly speaking, I think everyone is a wannabe, or no one. The idea of 'social-learning' means copying other ideas in order to help evolve them. I watched a video that suggested chimpanzees lacked social-learning skills, thus they could not evolve like humans by copying each other and improving. They merely do the same thing over and over.For me, when I use the word "wannabe" it comes down to authenticity. A wannabe to me isn't someone who sincerely wants to learn, they want "it" (whatever it happens to be) because it's cool or socially accepted.
I had an argument with a blues musician from northern Germany who suggested that only the Eric Clapton generation were NOT wannabes. All subsequent rock is wannabe. To me though, Clapton was a wannabe blues artist as well, as he copied the African American musicians. I don't see where the line is drawn. To stop change and innovation goes against human evolution.
The concept of wannabe thus has no productive meaning for human progress.
However, I do agree with you when you say we as humans copy each other to learn.