Ke daftar isi
Balas

Don't take risks

dari sudanglo, 18 April 2013

Pesan: 29

Bahasa: English

sudanglo (Tunjukkan profil) 18 April 2013 11.45.03

I was translating the Fire Safety notices for the British Congress (only 3 weeks to go now) and wanted to find a good way of saying Don't take risks.

I was very surprised searching the Tekstaro not to find any examples of preni with risko.

Ne risku doesn't seem to be a comfortable translation

J_Marc (Tunjukkan profil) 18 April 2013 11.55.53

How about something like,

Ne pligrandigu la eblon de danĝero per via faro.

efilzeo (Tunjukkan profil) 18 April 2013 12.01.28

Ne ebligu la riskon?

Tempodivalse (Tunjukkan profil) 18 April 2013 13.37.56

I suggest:

Ne estigu riskojn.

Nice and simple.

erinja (Tunjukkan profil) 18 April 2013 13.58.23

I wouldn't use "preni" with risko. It sounds like an excessively literal translation from English, to my ear.

I'd say "Ne risku!"

Riski is transitive but I think that "ne risku" works, just like "ne manĝu" works (even though "manĝi" is, of course, also transitive).

Balbutanto (Tunjukkan profil) 18 April 2013 15.28.55

sudanglo:I was translating the Fire Safety notices for the British Congress (only 3 weeks to go now) and wanted to find a good way of saying Don't take risks.

I was very surprised searching the Tekstaro not to find any examples of preni with risko.

Ne risku doesn't seem to be a comfortable translation
Evitu danĝeron ?

JDnDorks (Tunjukkan profil) 18 April 2013 15.55.48

Ooh! "Evitu riskajn kondutojn"!

Rugxdoma (Tunjukkan profil) 18 April 2013 18.57.41

Ne riskemu?

yyaann (Tunjukkan profil) 18 April 2013 20.18.49

Simile al kunmetaĵoj kiel enretiĝi, enlitiĝi, enteriĝi, aŭ enkaviĝi kaj ĉar "en danĝero" sufiĉe oftas, mi proponas:

Ne endanĝeriĝu.

Edit: I forgot this is the English-language forum. Sorry about that.

Chainy (Tunjukkan profil) 18 April 2013 20.50.09

I think Erin's probably right that it's fine to use the straightforward form 'Ne risku!'

Sudanglo, could you give the full text to see it within context?

Kembali ke atas