How good (or "correct") is language in Vikipedio?
de Lumturisto, 5 de marzo de 2009
Aportes: 21
Idioma: English
Lumturisto (Mostrar perfil) 5 de marzo de 2009 13:50:04
Thank you.
darkweasel (Mostrar perfil) 5 de marzo de 2009 15:50:13
mccambjd (Mostrar perfil) 5 de marzo de 2009 16:17:45
Oŝo-Jabe (Mostrar perfil) 5 de marzo de 2009 17:01:09
Frankouche (Mostrar perfil) 5 de marzo de 2009 18:26:11
number2 (Mostrar perfil) 6 de marzo de 2009 00:02:22
Frankouche:Absolutely jes. Jes jes and jes! It's THE reference, particulary this wikipedia pageYes, Frankouche, this is a very high quality source of information about Esperanto.
1Guy1 (Mostrar perfil) 6 de marzo de 2009 00:37:11
(OT: What is Esperanto for 'Kitten Huffing', it was mentioned in the Uncyclopedia article & I just have to know )
Oŝo-Jabe (Mostrar perfil) 6 de marzo de 2009 01:28:58
1Guy1:(OT: What is Esperanto for 'Kitten Huffing', it was mentioned in the Uncyclopedia article & I just have to know )You might try katidenspirado.
russ (Mostrar perfil) 6 de marzo de 2009 08:00:15
Lumturisto (Mostrar perfil) 6 de marzo de 2009 08:52:30
russ:Some articles have excellent Esperanto, many articles have at least a few minor language errors, and some articles are written by enthusiastic beginners who make many mistakes, often multiple mistakes in every sentence.No way to tell them apart (for those of us not linguistically competent enough)? Can you pin down say a collection of good writers and trace their articles? Sorry my dumb questions, never been into wiking apart from just using them occasionally.