How good (or "correct") is language in Vikipedio?
fra Lumturisto,2009 3 5
Meldinger: 21
Språk: English
Lumturisto (Å vise profilen) 2009 3 5 13:50:04
Thank you.
darkweasel (Å vise profilen) 2009 3 5 15:50:13
mccambjd (Å vise profilen) 2009 3 5 16:17:45
Oŝo-Jabe (Å vise profilen) 2009 3 5 17:01:09
Frankouche (Å vise profilen) 2009 3 5 18:26:11
number2 (Å vise profilen) 2009 3 6 00:02:22
Frankouche:Absolutely jes. Jes jes and jes! It's THE reference, particulary this wikipedia pageYes, Frankouche, this is a very high quality source of information about Esperanto.
1Guy1 (Å vise profilen) 2009 3 6 00:37:11
(OT: What is Esperanto for 'Kitten Huffing', it was mentioned in the Uncyclopedia article & I just have to know )
Oŝo-Jabe (Å vise profilen) 2009 3 6 01:28:58
1Guy1:(OT: What is Esperanto for 'Kitten Huffing', it was mentioned in the Uncyclopedia article & I just have to know )You might try katidenspirado.
russ (Å vise profilen) 2009 3 6 08:00:15
Lumturisto (Å vise profilen) 2009 3 6 08:52:30
russ:Some articles have excellent Esperanto, many articles have at least a few minor language errors, and some articles are written by enthusiastic beginners who make many mistakes, often multiple mistakes in every sentence.No way to tell them apart (for those of us not linguistically competent enough)? Can you pin down say a collection of good writers and trace their articles? Sorry my dumb questions, never been into wiking apart from just using them occasionally.