Kwa maudhui
Kujibu

How good (or "correct") is language in Vikipedio?

ya Lumturisto, 5 Machi 2009

Ujumbe: 21

Lugha: English

Lumturisto (Wasifu wa mtumiaji) 5 Machi 2009 1:50:04 alasiri

Can it be taken as a model, or an authoritative source (sort of: this is the word in Vikipedio, so thats it), or as material to learn?

Thank you.

darkweasel (Wasifu wa mtumiaji) 5 Machi 2009 3:50:13 alasiri

Anyone can edit Vikipedio, so it should NEVER be used as an authoritative source. However, I do believe that it can be used to learn to understand written Esperanto.

mccambjd (Wasifu wa mtumiaji) 5 Machi 2009 4:17:45 alasiri

As darkweasel said, it can't be used as an authoritative source: I've made edits myself and my esperanto grammar is terrible! lango.gif

Oŝo-Jabe (Wasifu wa mtumiaji) 5 Machi 2009 5:01:09 alasiri

In general it's okay, but certain neologisms like far, ŝli, and -iĉ- appear occasionally. Like Wikipedia in general it's probably good as a starting point for research, but not as the only source you use.

Frankouche (Wasifu wa mtumiaji) 5 Machi 2009 6:26:11 alasiri

Absolutely yes. Yes yes and yes! It's THE reference, particulary this wikipedia page

number2 (Wasifu wa mtumiaji) 6 Machi 2009 12:02:22 asubuhi

Frankouche:Absolutely jes. Jes jes and jes! It's THE reference, particulary this wikipedia page
Yes, Frankouche, this is a very high quality source of information about Esperanto.

1Guy1 (Wasifu wa mtumiaji) 6 Machi 2009 12:37:11 asubuhi

It has been pointed out several times that there is a frightening similarity between Wikipedia and the Hitch Hikers Guide to the Galaxy.

(OT: What is Esperanto for 'Kitten Huffing', it was mentioned in the Uncyclopedia article & I just have to know okulumo.gif )

Oŝo-Jabe (Wasifu wa mtumiaji) 6 Machi 2009 1:28:58 asubuhi

1Guy1:(OT: What is Esperanto for 'Kitten Huffing', it was mentioned in the Uncyclopedia article & I just have to know okulumo.gif )
You might try katidenspirado.

russ (Wasifu wa mtumiaji) 6 Machi 2009 8:00:15 asubuhi

Some articles have excellent Esperanto, many articles have at least a few minor language errors, and some articles are written by enthusiastic beginners who make many mistakes, often multiple mistakes in every sentence. Don't use Vikipedio as a model of good Esperanto. There are many better sources of good Esperanto text to learn from.

Lumturisto (Wasifu wa mtumiaji) 6 Machi 2009 8:52:30 asubuhi

russ:Some articles have excellent Esperanto, many articles have at least a few minor language errors, and some articles are written by enthusiastic beginners who make many mistakes, often multiple mistakes in every sentence.
No way to tell them apart (for those of us not linguistically competent enough)? Can you pin down say a collection of good writers and trace their articles? Sorry my dumb questions, never been into wiking apart from just using them occasionally.

Kurudi juu