How good (or "correct") is language in Vikipedio?
貼文者: Lumturisto, 2009年3月5日
訊息: 21
語言: English
Lumturisto (顯示個人資料) 2009年3月5日下午1:50:04
Thank you.
darkweasel (顯示個人資料) 2009年3月5日下午3:50:13
mccambjd (顯示個人資料) 2009年3月5日下午4:17:45
Oŝo-Jabe (顯示個人資料) 2009年3月5日下午5:01:09
Frankouche (顯示個人資料) 2009年3月5日下午6:26:11
number2 (顯示個人資料) 2009年3月6日上午12:02:22
Frankouche:Absolutely jes. Jes jes and jes! It's THE reference, particulary this wikipedia pageYes, Frankouche, this is a very high quality source of information about Esperanto.
1Guy1 (顯示個人資料) 2009年3月6日上午12:37:11
(OT: What is Esperanto for 'Kitten Huffing', it was mentioned in the Uncyclopedia article & I just have to know )
Oŝo-Jabe (顯示個人資料) 2009年3月6日上午1:28:58
1Guy1:(OT: What is Esperanto for 'Kitten Huffing', it was mentioned in the Uncyclopedia article & I just have to know )You might try katidenspirado.
russ (顯示個人資料) 2009年3月6日上午8:00:15
Lumturisto (顯示個人資料) 2009年3月6日上午8:52:30
russ:Some articles have excellent Esperanto, many articles have at least a few minor language errors, and some articles are written by enthusiastic beginners who make many mistakes, often multiple mistakes in every sentence.No way to tell them apart (for those of us not linguistically competent enough)? Can you pin down say a collection of good writers and trace their articles? Sorry my dumb questions, never been into wiking apart from just using them occasionally.