How good (or "correct") is language in Vikipedio?
dari Lumturisto, 5 Maret 2009
Pesan: 21
Bahasa: English
Lumturisto (Tunjukkan profil) 5 Maret 2009 13.50.04
Thank you.
darkweasel (Tunjukkan profil) 5 Maret 2009 15.50.13
mccambjd (Tunjukkan profil) 5 Maret 2009 16.17.45
Oŝo-Jabe (Tunjukkan profil) 5 Maret 2009 17.01.09
Frankouche (Tunjukkan profil) 5 Maret 2009 18.26.11
number2 (Tunjukkan profil) 6 Maret 2009 00.02.22
Frankouche:Absolutely jes. Jes jes and jes! It's THE reference, particulary this wikipedia pageYes, Frankouche, this is a very high quality source of information about Esperanto.
1Guy1 (Tunjukkan profil) 6 Maret 2009 00.37.11
(OT: What is Esperanto for 'Kitten Huffing', it was mentioned in the Uncyclopedia article & I just have to know )
Oŝo-Jabe (Tunjukkan profil) 6 Maret 2009 01.28.58
1Guy1:(OT: What is Esperanto for 'Kitten Huffing', it was mentioned in the Uncyclopedia article & I just have to know )You might try katidenspirado.
russ (Tunjukkan profil) 6 Maret 2009 08.00.15
Lumturisto (Tunjukkan profil) 6 Maret 2009 08.52.30
russ:Some articles have excellent Esperanto, many articles have at least a few minor language errors, and some articles are written by enthusiastic beginners who make many mistakes, often multiple mistakes in every sentence.No way to tell them apart (for those of us not linguistically competent enough)? Can you pin down say a collection of good writers and trace their articles? Sorry my dumb questions, never been into wiking apart from just using them occasionally.