How good (or "correct") is language in Vikipedio?
از Lumturisto, 5 مارس 2009
پستها: 21
زبان: English
Lumturisto (نمایش مشخصات) 5 مارس 2009، 13:50:04
Thank you.
darkweasel (نمایش مشخصات) 5 مارس 2009، 15:50:13
mccambjd (نمایش مشخصات) 5 مارس 2009، 16:17:45
Oŝo-Jabe (نمایش مشخصات) 5 مارس 2009، 17:01:09
Frankouche (نمایش مشخصات) 5 مارس 2009، 18:26:11
number2 (نمایش مشخصات) 6 مارس 2009، 0:02:22
Frankouche:Absolutely jes. Jes jes and jes! It's THE reference, particulary this wikipedia pageYes, Frankouche, this is a very high quality source of information about Esperanto.
1Guy1 (نمایش مشخصات) 6 مارس 2009، 0:37:11
(OT: What is Esperanto for 'Kitten Huffing', it was mentioned in the Uncyclopedia article & I just have to know )
Oŝo-Jabe (نمایش مشخصات) 6 مارس 2009، 1:28:58
1Guy1:(OT: What is Esperanto for 'Kitten Huffing', it was mentioned in the Uncyclopedia article & I just have to know )You might try katidenspirado.
russ (نمایش مشخصات) 6 مارس 2009، 8:00:15
Lumturisto (نمایش مشخصات) 6 مارس 2009، 8:52:30
russ:Some articles have excellent Esperanto, many articles have at least a few minor language errors, and some articles are written by enthusiastic beginners who make many mistakes, often multiple mistakes in every sentence.No way to tell them apart (for those of us not linguistically competent enough)? Can you pin down say a collection of good writers and trace their articles? Sorry my dumb questions, never been into wiking apart from just using them occasionally.